Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jireh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$696k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.2MInternational$787kEducation$712kScience & Tech$451kRecreation & Sports$236kPhilanthropy$140kHealth$98kSocial Science$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $385k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND$170,000
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON$110,000
GLAD TIDINGS INDIA$105,000
WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE$30,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSTRAND FUND$30,000
WORLD VISION$30,000
UNICEF USA$30,000
NE UNIVERSITY$30,000
TERMEER FOUNDATION$25,000
INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND$25,000
OPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION$25,000
THE POSSIBLE PROJECT$20,000
GTI HOPE$20,000
ELEVATE NEW ENGLAND$20,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE: $30k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $166k → 9%HILLSONG FOUNDATION: $175k → 10%OPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%GTI HOPE: $105k → 14%UNICEF USA: $100k → 17%WORLD VISION: $180k → 9%CHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCES: $76k → 9%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $145k → 9%HILLSONG FOUNDATION: $175k → 10%UNICEF USA: $66k → 17%WORLD VISION: $150k → 9%CHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCES: $75k → 9%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $105k → 9%HILLSWOOD FOUNDATION: $135k → 10%UNICEF USA: $50k → 17%WORLD VISION: $85k → 9%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $105k → 9%HILLSONG FOUNDATION: $125k → 10%UNICEF USA: $40k → 17%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $35k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $100k → 9%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $35k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $100k → 9%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $35k → 16%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $60k → 9%GLAD TIDINGS INDIA: $60k → 9%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $282k → 8%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $261k → 8%DENMARK HEART FOR THE HOUSE 2019: $50k → 16%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $204k → 8%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND: $36k → 16%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $170k → 8%INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND: $32k → 16%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $150k → 8%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $150k → 8%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $150k → 8%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $130k → 8%TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $120k → 8%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $110k → 16%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $60k → 16%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $55k → 16%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $48k → 16%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
NC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 21 repeat orgs$359k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$5.1M
$289k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
-13%

Still filing today

52%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCivil RightsRecreation & SportsInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GTI HOPE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $986k · revenue +107%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $320k · revenue +87%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    5× · 2021–2025 · $286k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • HF
    HILLSWOOD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $135k
  • DH
    DENMARK HEART FOR THE HOUSE 2019
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
9
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLAND: $1,616,510 · OtherTRINITARIAN CHURCH OF WAYLANDHILLSONG FOUNDATION: $475,000 · OtherHILLSONG FOUNDATIONMUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $395,642 · OtherMUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTONHILLSWOOD FOUNDATION: $135,000 · Other+14 more: $506,500 · Other+14 moreGTI HOPE: $986,000 · EducationGTI HOPENORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $320,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC: $110,000 · EducationBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INCOPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Education+4 more: $43,200 · EducationWORLD VISION INC: $445,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION I…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $286,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES …CHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC: $236,000 · Recreation & SportsWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $55,000 · HealthTHE TERMEER INSTITUTE INC: $45,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 · HealthLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $7,500 · HealthINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $55,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 · Civil RightsELEVATE NEW ENGLAND INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,128,652Education$1,539,200International$731,000Recreation & Sports$236,000Health$132,500Civil Rights$80,500Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGTI HOPE: $986,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $445,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $320,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $286,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC: $236,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $55,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TERMEER INSTITUTE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetDavidson College: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE NEW ENGLAND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GTI HOPE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPHTHALMOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE TERMEER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWBROOK SCHOOL OF WESTON INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jireh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jireh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • International Institute of New England Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jireh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jireh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jireh’s filings →

More from the funding graph