Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jerry E Baker Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$649k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$643k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.8MYouth Development$80kHealth$77kArts & Culture$53kEnvironment$30kAnimals$13kEducation$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $250k+1 grant · $643k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WKU FOUNDATION$642,541
OPERATION PRIDE$5,000
AVIATION HERITAGE PARK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%NEW BEGINNINGS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 16 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$4.0M
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+37%

Still filing today

31%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +361%
  • OP
    OPERATION PRIDE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue ×17
  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN WARREN COUNTY HUMANE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BOWLING GREEN AREA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +52%
  • SK
    SOUTHERN KENTUCKY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Racing Health and Welfare Fund Inc

To provide exclusively for the benefit, aid, relief, and assistance of the racing personnel employed in connection with horse racing who can demonstrate their need for financial assistance.

—
2
Kentucky Golf Association Inc

To foster, promote and advance the interests and the true spirit of the game of golf throughout the commonwealth of kentucky, and in conjunction therewith to lend its cooperation and assistance to the united states golf association, and to…

Recreation & Sports
3
Kentucky Golf Foundation Inc

Through the framework of the greatest game ever played, the kentucky golf foundation seeks to impact kentucky's youth, military and those of diversity using golf as a toolkit.

Arts & Culture
4
George K Bowling Community Park Inc

George k. bowling community park, inc. was incorporated under the laws of kentucky as a not-for-profit corporation on october 20, 1978 for the charitable purpose of providing a recreational outlet for approximately 14,700 citizens in and…

Human Services
5
Wku Real Estate Corporation

Charitable civic-improvement corporation established for the benefit of western kentucky university

Health
6
Kentucky Aviation Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
7
Kentucky Derby Museum Corporation

To engage,educate, and excite everyone about the extraordinary experience that is the kentucky derby!

—
8
Preservation Kentucky Inc

Preservation kentucky's mission is to build support for and protect kentucky's historic structures and resources.

Arts & Culture
9
Ward Hall Preservation Foundation

Acquire and maintain a historically significant structure in scott county, kentucky.

Arts & Culture
10
Kentucky Equine Humane Center Inc

The mission of the kentucky equine humane center, inc (kyehc) is to create second chances for kentucky's equines through care, retraingin, and adoption, while educating the public to ensure every horse thrives.

Animals
11
Bowling Green Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

The bowling green area chamber of commerce focuses its work on four strategic areas to improve the business climate and overall quality of life in south central kentucky: regional economic development, existing business development,…

—
12
Blue Grass Farms Charities Inc

To maintain a comprehensive enrichment center with assistance to persons working in central kentucky's thoroughbred industry. includes counseling, housing and utility assistance, food and clothing, medical and dental, referral sources &…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vette City Roller Derby Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WKU FOUNDATION: $3,819,216 · OtherWKU FOUNDATION+25 more: $180,705 · OtherCommonwealth Health Foundation Inc: $75,000 · HealthOPERATION PRIDE INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentAVIATION HERITAGE PARK: $6,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC THEATRE OF KENTUCKY INC: $5,640 · Arts & CultureBOWLING GREEN WARREN COUNTY HUMANE: $10,000 · AnimalsHILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $4,400 · Recreation & SportsVette City Roller Derby Inc: $1,300 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC: $3,500 · Philanthropy
Other$3,999,921Health$75,000Environment$30,000Arts & Culture$11,640Animals$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,700Philanthropy$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommonwealth Health Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetOPERATION PRIDE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetBOWLING GREEN WARREN COUNTY HUMANE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAVIATION HERITAGE PARK: $6,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC THEATRE OF KENTUCKY INC: $5,640 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $4,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVette City Roller Derby Inc: $1,300 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetLINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Commonwealth Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION PRIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BOWLING GREEN AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOWLING GREEN WARREN COUNTY HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds AVIATION HERITAGE PARK ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC THEATRE OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOPPER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds Vette City Roller Derby Inc ↗
  • Who funds LINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of South Central Kentucky IncKY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of South Central Kentucky Inc · The John M & Linda J Kelly Family Charitable Foundation · The Harold Juanita David Dennis & Gary Koon Family Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jerry E Baker Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jerry E Baker Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jerry E Baker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph