· Private foundation
The Jerry B Brunson Enterprise Rotary Club
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE JERRY B BRUNSON ENTERPRISE ROTARY CLUB’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $3,350 |
| LUNCHES FOR LEARNING | $2,500 |
| FAMILY SERVICES CENTER | $2,500 |
| CHRISTIAN MISSION | $2,000 |
| EASTERSEALS CAMP ASCCA | $1,600 |
| WIREGRASS EMERGENCY PREGANANCY SERV | $1,500 |
| ENTERPRISE CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP | $1,200 |
| VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,000 |
| WIREGRASS UNITED WAY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ARMY AVIATION-OZARK | $1,000 |
| ARMY AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS COFFEE-DALE | $1,000 |
| ENTERPRISE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WUWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +12%
- VBVIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +14%
- YYMCA6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- JBJERRY B BRUNSON ROTAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
- FSFAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF COFFEE COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to help alleviate hunger and food insecurity in west alabama.
The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.
Arkansas employment career centers' mission is to assist individuals with career opportunities through education and training. the primary target groups are individuals returning home from incarceration, veterans, homeless, and young…
To provide education, opportunities and support services in an effort to prevent teen pregnancy.
To provide food, clothing, lodging,medical & dental, prescription drugs, and travel for the needy of chilton county, alabama.
Dedicated to the promotion and protection of the general health and well being of children in chickasaw county, ms and surrounding areas by providing food, clothing, and other support for children and families in need.
To end hunger by assisting food bank networks in obtaining more food and funds, fostering public awareness of the food banks' mission, and creating partnerships to alleviate hunger in alabama.
To provide a summer camp facility within a christian environment. approximately 750 children are served annually.
Social services
The mission of the organization is to reduce the effects of proverty in walker county, al
To develop natural and human resources to furher conservation for the benefit of the general public To promote soil and water conservation To develop the natural resources in a 10 county area of Alabama
To provide for the physical and spiritual needs of the homeless in montgomery, al
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wiregrass United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wiregrass Emergency Pregnancy Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD ↗
- Who funds YMCA ↗
- Who funds LUNCHES FOR LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WIREGRASS EMERGENCY PREGNANCY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA-FLORIDA COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds CAMILLE PLACE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MISSION CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds EXCHANGE CENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds ARMY AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ARMY AVIATION - OZARK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Edwin L and Elizabeth L Skelton Foundation · Wiregrass United Way Inc · Wiregrass Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jerry B Brunson Enterprise Rotary Club funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jerry B Brunson Enterprise Rotary Club?
Find your warmest path to The Jerry B Brunson Enterprise Rotary Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.