Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jerome Mirza Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$769k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.5MCrime & Legal$1.9MHousing & Shelter$921kPhilanthropy$690kArts & Culture$657kRecreation & Sports$436kHuman Services$142kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $330k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TINERVIN FAMILY FOUNDATION$250,000
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$125,000
U OF I COLLEGE OF LAW$100,000
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$55,000
JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION$50,000
HOLIDAY SPECTACULAR$35,000
PUBLIC INTEREST LAW INITIATIVE$35,000
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES$25,000
PRAIRIE FIRE THEATRE$25,000
ILLINOIS BAR FOUNDATION$25,000
KNOX COLLEGE$25,000
MUSIC CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION$17,478
ILLINIOIS SUPREME COURT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARCFIRST: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 16 repeat orgs$384k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$6.4M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+49%

Still filing today

63%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $921k · revenue +370%
  • JG
    JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $336k · revenue +84%
  • HS
    HOLIDAY SPECTACULAR INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $275k · revenue +22% · 57% of their budget

Funded once

  • WT
    WILMETTE THEATRE
    one grant, 2019 · $29k
  • IS
    ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • IS
    ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT HISTORIC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Fiscal Policy Council
Public Benefit
2
Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra

Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra's mission as a professional orchestra is to utilize the universal expression of music to create profound, inspiring, and personal connections between the people and communities of Chicagos Southland.

Arts & Culture
3
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
4
Citizen Action Illinois Education Fund

Public education on current public policy issues

Public Benefit
5
Arts Illiana Inc

To promote the arts and provide an information system for and about the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
7
Illinois Equal Justice Foundation

The illinois equal justice foundation funds civil legal aid in illinois to champion the rights of those burdened by barriers to justice. we envision equitable access to and navigation of the illinois civil legal system.

—
8
Illinois Trial Lawyers Association

The objectives of the Association shall be to: uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the State of Illinois; secure and protect the rights of those injured in their persons or civil rights; defend trial by jury and the…

—
9
Advance Illinois Nfp

Advance illinois was founded in 2008 as an independent policy and advocacy organization that works toward a heathy public education system that prepares students to achieve success in college, career, and civic life. advance illinois is…

Education
10
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
11
Illinois Association for Gifted Children

The illinois association for gifted children empowers educators, families and communities by advancing effective practices, programs and policies to promote the development of gifted and talented children throughout illinois.

Education
12
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tinervin Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLINOIS WESLEYAN FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · OtherILLINOIS WESLEYAN FOUNDATIONU OF I COLLEGE OF LAW: $1,200,000 · OtherU OF I COLLEGE OF LAWCenter for Gifted: $361,000 · OtherCenter for GiftedTHE TINERVIN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherTHE TINERVIN FAMILY FOUNDATION+11 more: $350,795 · Other+11 moreCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $921,000 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTIONS FO…HOLIDAY SPECTACULAR INC: $275,000 · Arts & CulturePrairie Fire Theatre: $179,500 · Arts & CultureMUSIC CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $112,119 · Arts & CultureILLINOIS PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $440,000 · PhilanthropyPublic Interest Law Initiative: $267,030 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $165,000 · Crime & LegalIllinois Bar Foundation: $225,000 · EducationKNOX COLLEGE: $160,002 · EducationLINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $336,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$4,161,795Housing & Shelter$921,000Arts & Culture$566,619Philanthropy$440,000Crime & Legal$432,030Education$410,002Recreation & Sports$336,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $921,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetILLINOIS PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $440,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetCenter for Gifted: $361,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $336,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetHOLIDAY SPECTACULAR INC: $275,000 over 8y, 57% of budgetPublic Interest Law Initiative: $267,030 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetIllinois Bar Foundation: $225,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetPrairie Fire Theatre: $179,500 over 9y, 47% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $165,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE: $160,002 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $112,119 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG ACCESS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LINCOLN ACADEMY OF ILLINOIS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Illinois State Historical Society: $2,825 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Gifted ↗
  • Who funds JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLIDAY SPECTACULAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Public Interest Law Initiative ↗
  • Who funds THE TINERVIN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Bar Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Prairie Fire Theatre ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds KNOX COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LIFELONG ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds THE LINCOLN ACADEMY OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds The Illinois State Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA12.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jerome Mirza Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jerome Mirza Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jerome Mirza Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jerome Mirza Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jerome Mirza’s filings →

    More from the funding graph