Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jelly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$10kEducation$8kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$3kHuman Services$2kReligion$2kArts & Culture$2kCommunity Improvement$500
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORA FOOD PANTRY$1,000
HEALING PINES RESPITE INC$1,000
NOOR EL-SALAM$1,000
FAMILY READING PARTNERS$1,000
CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF THE TRIANGLE$1,000
PORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO$500
CHRISTMAS HOUSE INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY READING PARTNERS: $1k → 16%SCOTT-FREE SCHOLARSHIP: $750 → 8%THE CHRISTMAS HOUSE: $500 → 9%CAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%RIVERWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 10%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $500 → 11%COMPASS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1k → 13%FAMILY READING PARTNERS: $1k → 16%CAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION: $625 → 9%CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF THE TRIANGLE: $1k → 11%THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $500 → 13%FAMILY READING PARTNERS: $1k → 16%CAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF THE TRIANGLE: $750 → 11%PORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO: $500 → 13%FAMILY READING PARTNERS: $750 → 16%CAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%BOOK HARVEST: $700 → 11%HEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $3k → 13%FAMILY READING PARTNERS: $500 → 16%CORA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%HEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $2k → 13%CORA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%HEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $2k → 13%CORA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%HEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $2k → 13%CORA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%HEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $1k → 13%HEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $625 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of The Jelly Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in NC; by stated purpose, 65%.

The Jelly Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 7 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$26k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+121%

Still filing today

57%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HEALING PINES RESPITE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue -10%
  • FR
    FAMILY READING PARTNERS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4k
  • CF
    CORA FOOD PANTRY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k

Funded once

  • CC
    COMPASS CENTER FOR WOMEN
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • RE
    RIVERWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
2
TreesCharlotte

Public/private collaborative to plant trees, raise awareness of the canopy, and educate about tree care.

Environment
3
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
4
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
5
Carolina Children's Charity Inc

To provide support to lowcountry children with birth defects and/or childhood diseases.

Health
6
The Charlotte Center for the Humanities Inc

The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.

Human Services
7
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
8
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
9
Carolina Foothills Foundation

Provides medical and emotional services to terminally ill patients in rutherford county, north carolina. starting in june, 2022 the organization focused on being a 501(c)3 charitable organization that provides direct support and empower…

Human Services
10
Woods Charter School

Operation of a north carolina public charter school

Education
11
Cary Christian School Incorporated

Cary christian school provides an excellent classical education founded upon a biblical worldview. classical christian education is an integrated approach to learning which complements students' natural learning stages while infusing…

Education
12
Cary Chinese School

Cary Chinese School provides weekend Chinese language courses to students from Pre-K to 8th grade.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chapel Hill-Carrboro Public School Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Carolina Swims Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY READING PARTNERS: $4,250 · OtherFAMILY READING PARTNERSCORA FOOD PANTRY: $4,000 · OtherCORA FOOD PANTRYNOOR EL-SALAM: $2,000 · OtherNOOR EL-SALAMChristmas House Inc: $2,000 · OtherChristmas House IncThe Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle: $1,750 · OtherThe Chamber Orchestra of the TriangleCOMPASS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $1,000 · OtherCOMPASS CENTER FOR WOMENRIVERWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1,000 · OtherRIVERWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $750 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherHEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $9,125 · HealthHEALING PINES RESPITE INCCAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION: $2,625 · Youth DevelopmentCAROLINA …CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBOOK HARVEST: $700 · EducationEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $500 · Community ImprovementPORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$17,250Health$9,125Youth Development$2,625Philanthropy$1,000Education$700Community Improvement$500Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALING PINES RESPITE INC: $9,125 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION: $2,625 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetChristmas House Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOOK HARVEST: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALING PINES RESPITE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA SWIMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Christmas House Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Chamber Orchestra of the Triangle ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOOK HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
  • Who funds PORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Strowd Roses IncNC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Strowd Roses Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University · Duke Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jelly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jelly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jelly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph