Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jelks Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$229k
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Environment$247kRecreation & Sports$53kAnimals$34kPublic Benefit$21kCivil Rights$20kArts & Culture$14kInternational$13kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k52 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$800
Median grant
13
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION$50,000
CONSERVING CAROLINA$27,875
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$25,000
BIG WATERS LAND TRUST$21,000
SARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY$17,500
ALACHUA CONSERVATIVE TRUST$16,500
SOUTHERN ENVIROMENTAL LAW CENTER$8,675
WAMBALE INC$7,525
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
JUSTICE FIRST$3,900
PROGRESS UNITY FUND$3,900
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$3,500
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$3,500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE$2,350
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $1k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $1k → 14%JUSTICE FIRST: $4k → 14%JUSTICE FIRST: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$379k · 47 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
13

Total granted

$379k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

70%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Conserving Carolina
    2× · 2024–2025 · $90k · revenue +231%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +27%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CF
    CONSERVATIVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $21k
  • FC
    FLORIDA CONSERVATION GROUP INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation Florida Inc

Conservation florida's mission is to permanently protect florida's water, wildlife, and wild places - the places that make florida home.

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
The Everglades Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
7
Georgia Conservancy Inc

To protect georgia through ecological and economic solutions for stewardship, conservation, and sustainable use of the land and its resources.

Environment
8
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
9
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
10
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
11
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
12
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Wambale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Arts OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and AdoptionEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr9%36%35–55yr12%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr15%47%20–35yr9%37%35–55yr12%7%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/102,995

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
16/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Conserving Carolina — $90,375 · EnvironmentConserving CarolinaTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $29,500 · EnvironmentALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INCBig Waters Land Trust Inc — $21,000 · EnvironmentBig Waters Land Trust IncFLORIDA CONSERVATION GROUP INC — $10,000 · Environment+8 more — $13,525 · Environment+8 moreSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $29,675 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERSARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $21,500 · OtherSARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY INCCONSERVATIVE FOUNDATION — $21,000 · OtherCONSERVATIVE FOUNDATIONFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $8,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPROGRESS UNITY FUND — $7,750 · OtherPROGRESS UNITY FUNDFLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT — $5,500 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE — $4,850 · OtherCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $6,150 · Other+30 more — $34,325 · Other+30 moreFLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $50,500 · Recreation & SportsFLORIDA STATE…+2 more — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsWAMBALE INC — $13,075 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,700 · InternationalCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $4,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $3,500 · AnimalsBlue Ridge Humane Society Inc — $1,875 · AnimalsFlorida Wildlife Federation — $1,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,000 · AnimalsSt Augustine Humane Society Inc — $1,000 · AnimalsJacksonville Symphony Association Inc — $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CAVALIERS AP&E INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureFERNANDO PULLUM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER — $2,000 · Arts & CultureHIPPODROME STATE THEATRE INC — $1,800 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE FRANCAISE DE WASHINGTON INC — $750 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureJUSTICE FIRST — $7,750 · Human ServicesNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $200 · Human Services
Environment$204,400Other$138,750Recreation & Sports$52,000International$18,775Animals$12,875Arts & Culture$10,650Human Services$9,950

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetConserving Carolina — $90,375 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $50,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $29,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $29,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $21,500 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetBig Waters Land Trust Inc — $21,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWAMBALE INC — $13,075 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFLORIDA CONSERVATION GROUP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $6,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT — $5,500 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetOCEANA INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville Symphony Association Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc — $3,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEACHES GO GREEN INC — $3,200 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANASOTA - 88 INC — $2,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE CAVALIERS AP&E INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFERNANDO PULLUM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Ridge Humane Society Inc — $1,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIPPODROME STATE THEATRE INC — $1,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Florida State University Foundation Inc — $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Wildlife Federation — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaking An Impact Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern College of Optometry — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Area Bicyclist Association — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC — $825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FRANCAISE DE WASHINGTON INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD OF THE MIGHTY FOOD BANK INC — $700 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY GULF — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLORIDA TRAIL ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREE FOUNDATION INC — $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA BICYCLE ASSOCIATION INC — $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC SAVANNAH FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTYBEE ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Felburn FoundationMD22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Felburn Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Jacarlene Foundation · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jelks Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • The Florida Trail Association Inc100% of income from government
  • Anacostia Watershed Society Inc15% of income from government
  • Putnam Land Conservancy Inc13% of income from government
  • Florida Conservation Group Inc7% of income from government
  • Alachua Conservation Trust Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jelks Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jelks Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph