· Private foundation
The Jelks Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k52 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CONSERVING CAROLINA | $27,875 |
| TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $25,000 |
| BIG WATERS LAND TRUST | $21,000 |
| SARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY | $17,500 |
| ALACHUA CONSERVATIVE TRUST | $16,500 |
| SOUTHERN ENVIROMENTAL LAW CENTER | $8,675 |
| WAMBALE INC | $7,525 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $4,000 |
| JUSTICE FIRST | $3,900 |
| PROGRESS UNITY FUND | $3,900 |
| CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $3,500 |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | $3,500 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE | $2,350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
47 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCConserving Carolina2× · 2024–2025 · $90k · revenue +231%
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +27%- CRCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- CFCONSERVATIVE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $21k
- FCFLORIDA CONSERVATION GROUP INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Conservation florida's mission is to permanently protect florida's water, wildlife, and wild places - the places that make florida home.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
To protect georgia through ecological and economic solutions for stewardship, conservation, and sustainable use of the land and its resources.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).
Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…
Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…
We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Wambale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Conserving Carolina ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALACHUA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SARASOTA AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Big Waters Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds WAMBALE INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA CONSERVATION GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FIRST ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BEACHES GO GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds MANASOTA - 88 INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAVALIERS AP&E INC ↗
- Who funds FERNANDO PULLUM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Blue Ridge Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds HIPPODROME STATE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Florida Wildlife Federation ↗
- Who funds Making An Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Felburn Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Jacarlene Foundation · William G and Marie Selby Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jelks Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Florida Trail Association Inc — 100% of income from government
- Anacostia Watershed Society Inc — 15% of income from government
- Putnam Land Conservancy Inc — 13% of income from government
- Florida Conservation Group Inc — 7% of income from government
- Alachua Conservation Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jelks Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Jelks Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.