Skip to content
The Jawad Omair Yasin Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Jawad Omair Yasin Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.4MEducation$50kHealth$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kHuman Services$23kInternational$13kCrime & Legal$7kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City$200,000
Friends of Indus Hospital Inc$25,000
Zaytuna College$2,500
The Citizens Foundation USA$2,000
Special Care Inc$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Citizens Foundation USA: $2k → 16%Surayya Anne Foundation OKC: $2k → 16%Helping Hand: $10k → 8%Helping Hand: $2k → 8%The Citizens Foundation USA: $3k → 16%Helping Hand: $1k → 8%The Citizens Foundation USA: $2k → 16%The Citizens Foundation USA: $2k → 16%The Citizens Foundation USA: $2k → 16%The Citizens Foundation USA: $1k → 16%The Citizens Foundation USA: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $2k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%Special Care Inc: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
VA
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$1.5M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+26%

Still filing today

58%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    Rehmat Foundation
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue +36%
  • ZC
    Zaytuna College Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $16k · revenue +9%
  • HH
    HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • NA
    NISHTAR ALUMNI OF NORTH AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +35%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
3
Itqaan Institute

An educational organization providing premier educational services to those who cannot afford it, as well as general charitable services

Education
4
Dawat-E-Islami Wa

To propagate the teachings of the holy quran and the sunnah of the holy and nobel prophet, prophet muhammad (peace & blessings be upon him) including, without limitation, to organize educational and prayer sessions for the teaching of the…

Religion
5
Shakir Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
6
Noohra Foundation

Noorha is a non-profit religious educational foundation whose mission is to provide biblical research and educational materials on various subjects.

Arts & Culture
7
Institute of Infection Prevention and Control

Our mission is to reduce the burden of infectious and communicable diseases in Pakistan through capacity building of healthcare providers, and by educating people about preventive and precautionary mechanisms. We strive to break the chain…

Health
8
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
9
Narkar Health Foundation

Our mission is to provide quality, safe & comprehensive health care to those in need.

Health
10
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
11
American Imam Academy

Education

Religion
12
American Muslim Health Professionals

We are a non-profit organization bringing together and strengthening the impact of Muslim health professionals to improve the health and wellness of all Americans.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citizens Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is Rehmat Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $1,298,000 · OtherISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY+15 more: $70,640 · OtherRehmat Foundation: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNISHTAR ALUMNI OF NORTH AMERICA (NANA): $25,000 · PhilanthropyAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE SEED: $22,000 · ReligionZaytuna College Inc: $16,000 · ReligionHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $13,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL CARE INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesSADAQA FOR ALL FOUNDATION OKC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Civil RightsASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA: $3,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,368,640Philanthropy$75,000Education$51,000Religion$38,000Human Services$37,000Health$26,000Civil Rights$5,500Community Improvement$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetRehmat Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetNISHTAR ALUMNI OF NORTH AMERICA (NANA): $25,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEED: $22,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetZaytuna College Inc: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDANCE COLLEGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Rehmat Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NISHTAR ALUMNI OF NORTH AMERICA (NANA) ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEED ↗
  • Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds HEART RHYTHM SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SADAQA FOR ALL FOUNDATION OKC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDANCE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodFidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC8.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jawad Omair Yasin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jawad Omair Yasin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 79%
  • Dale Rogers Training Center Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jawad Omair Yasin Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jawad Omair Yasin Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jawad Omair Yasin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home