Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jaunich Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of The Jaunich Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Jaunich Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $289k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
8
’18
9
’19
10
’20
10
’21
9
’22
16
’23
10
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.3MEducation$660kYouth Development$550kEnvironment$375kHealth$160kPublic Benefit$130kHousing & Shelter$100kAnimals$65kOther$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $169k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$50,000
NAVAL POST GRADUATE SCHOOL$50,000
PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION$25,000
THE VERMONT FOODBANK$20,000
THE LIVING DESERT$20,000
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$20,000
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$19,414
SPECTRUM YOUTH$15,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
YOUTH ON COURSE$10,000
PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM$10,000
CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL$10,000
EASTSIDE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$10,000
BURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL PARENTS GROUP$7,500
ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $3k → 10%SPECTRUM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MA
IA
PA
CA
CO
MD
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of The Jaunich Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Jaunich Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 21 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +100% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$1.8M
$238k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+100%

Still filing today

76%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $430k · revenue +133%
  • SB
    SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +73%
  • MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $128k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • E
    EAGLEBROOK
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • CO
    COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Brentwood School

Brentwood inspires every student to think critically and creatively, act ethically, and shape a future with meaning. the core values are trust, respect, responsibility, honesty, caring, community, and diversity.

Education
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
8
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
9
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
10
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Connections Centers; the most unlike its peers is Sutter Bay Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,287,212 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTNAVAL POST GRADUATE SCHOOL: $149,700 · OtherNAVAL POST GRADUATE SCHOOLNCGA FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherNCGA FOUNDATIONBOSTON UNIVERSITY WHEELOCK COLLEGE OF EDUCATION: $100,000 · OtherBOSTON UNIVERSITY WHEELOCK COLLEG…EAGLEBROOK: $100,000 · OtherEAGLEBROOKTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL: $92,500 · OtherTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOLAUDUBON VERMONT: $65,000 · OtherAUDUBON VERMONTHOLY TRINITY CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherARMSTRONG SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $35,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $65,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER IN…VERMONT FOODBANK: $60,000 · OtherVERMONT FOODBANK+16 more: $176,250 · Other+16 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $430,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS …PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $110,000 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THE: $95,000 · EnvironmentEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $35,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · EducationEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $70,000 · EducationBURLINGAME COMMUNITY FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $22,750 · EducationSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $155,000 · HealthMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $127,719 · Animals
Philanthropy$1,287,212Other$1,043,450Youth Development$430,000Environment$245,000Education$217,750Health$155,000Animals$127,719

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,287,212 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $430,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $127,719 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $110,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $95,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL: $92,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBURLINGAME COMMUNITY FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $22,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL PARENTS GROUP: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAREY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Volunteers Inc ↗
  • Who funds BURLINGAME COMMUNITY FOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL PARENTS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CAREY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jaunich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jaunich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Sea Education Association Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jaunich Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph