· Private foundation
The Jason T Dickerson Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE JASON T DICKERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $203k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BETHANY PLACE | $75,770 |
| CHEROKEE COUNTY HOMELESS VETS | $71,751 |
| PICKENS ANIMAL RESCUE RANCH | $55,043 |
| IRON GAIT PERCHERONS | $41,558 |
| CHEROKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL CENTER | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA | $25,000 |
| AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRICULTURAL COLLEG | $12,500 |
| BERRY COLLEGE | $9,687 |
| KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY | $6,347 |
| THE PHOENIX AT UNION HILL | $3,342 |
| THE BRIAN CENTER FOR HEALTH | $2,727 |
| VOLUNTEER AGING COUNCIL | $1,915 |
| INTEGRATED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES | $1,600 |
| CHEROKEE COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDAT | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EVETOWAH VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC3× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +39%
- SLSERVICE LEAGUE OF CHEROKEE COUNTY2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +320%
- TCTHE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $36k
- BCBRIAN CENTER FOR HEALTH Aone grant, 2018 · $14k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Emergency foster care for abused and neglected children in pickens, dawson, and surrounding counties.
Provide temporary shelter and assistance
Facilitating the care of underpriveledged children including the care of foster children.
To care for abused and injured animals and place them in good homes.
Provide Displaced Children in a loving, warm, nurturing, educational therapeutic home with foster parents until permanency can be sought or by return to biological families or placement in adoptive homes
Providing home for handicapped children who are wards of the State of Georgia - Maintenance, Education and Care
Humane society
Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling
Prevention of cruelty to animals
Group home providing long term and emergency care to youth in the care of the south carolina department of social services serving youth ages 13-20.
Support for low income families in need
Community Share's mission is to feed, clothe, and house people in need within the Polk County, GA and surrounding communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is 575 Fools Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Cherokee County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds BETHANY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Iron Gait Percherons Inc ↗
- Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds ETOWAH VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICE LEAGUE OF CHEROKEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds ACES YOUTH HOME INC ↗
- Who funds PICKENS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Must Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HIDDEN ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cobb Emc Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · McClure Family Foundation Inc Co Truist Foundations & Endowments Spec · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Community Foundation of Northwest Georgia Inc · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Carmax Foundation · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jason T Dickerson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jason T Dickerson Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Jason T Dickerson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.