Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Janning Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

International$124kPhilanthropy$80kReligion$58kFood & Nutrition$47kHealth$39kHuman Services$33kCrime & Legal$28kEnvironment$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $57k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS$17,000
Capital Area Food Bank$10,000
CARROLL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS$10,000
WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF$10,000
HELP OF DOOR COUNTY$8,000
HOMEWARD TRAILS$6,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS$5,100
HANDICAPPED PETS FOUNDATION$5,100
GRACE FOUNDATION$5,000
AIR FORCE AID SOCIETY$5,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$3,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%UNICEF USA: $4k → 17%North Texas Ford Bank: $5k → 5%SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS: $4k → 10%CARROLL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS: $20k → 14%Capital Area Food Bank: $10k → 14%Life Wise STL: $8k → 21%DOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%Sandy Hook Promise: $10k → 9%WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF: $10k → 14%HOMEWARD TRAILS: $6k → 6%AIR FORCE AID SOCIETY: $5k → 7%SAFE SPACE NOVA: $4k → 9%ONE TREE PLANTED: $4k → 10%HANDICAPPED PETS FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%CARROLL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS: $17k → 14%Capital Area Food Bank: $10k → 14%EPWORTH: $8k → 11%CROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK: $10k → 8%WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF: $10k → 14%HOMEWARD TRAILS: $5k → 6%AIR FORCE AID SOCIETY: $5k → 7%SAFE SPACE NOVA: $4k → 9%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS: $17k → 14%Capital Area Food Bank: $10k → 14%HELP OF DOOR COUNTY: $8k → 8%WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF: $10k → 14%HOMEWARD TRAILS: $4k → 6%AIR FORCE AID SOCIETY: $5k → 7%SAFE SPACE NOVA: $4k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS: $5k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS: $17k → 14%Capital Area Food Bank: $8k → 14%HELP OF DOOR COUNTY: $8k → 8%HOMEWARD TRAILS: $4k → 6%AIR FORCE AID SOCIETY: $5k → 7%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS: $12k → 14%HELP OF DOOR COUNTY: $8k → 8%ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS: $12k → 6%AIR FORCE AID SOCIETY: $5k → 7%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%HELP OF DOOR COUNTY: $8k → 8%ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS: $10k → 6%HELP OF DOOR COUNTY: $5k → 8%ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS: $10k → 6%ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS: $10k → 6%ECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MT
IL
WI
NY
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$407k · 14 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$407k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+4%

Still filing today

64%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalInternationalEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $88k · revenue +2%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +39%
  • HELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $39k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • CROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -41%
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
4
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
5
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
8
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
9
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
11
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

12
Toxic-Free Future F/K/a Washington Toxics Coalition

As a national leader in environmental health research and advocacy, toxic- free future uses the power of science, education, and activism, to drive strong laws and corporate responsibility that protect the health of all people and the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sandy Hook Promise Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Clear Blue Sea. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic School District Foun…Land Conservation Organizat…Community FoundationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%52%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRACE FOUNDATION — $54,000 · OtherGRACE FOUNDATIONECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERS — $52,000 · OtherECUMENICAL COMMUNITY HELPING OTHERSHOMEWARD TRAILS — $19,000 · OtherHOMEWARD TRAILSSAFE SPACE NOVA — $12,000 · OtherCarroll Education Foundation Inc — $19,000 · OtherCarroll Education Foundation IncDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · OtherDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCCROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC — $10,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $9,100 · Other+12 more — $56,700 · Other+12 moreJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC — $88,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT O…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $4,000 · International+1 more — $2,000 · InternationalCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $42,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL A…HELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC — $39,000 · HealthWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP — $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterYALL SQUAD INCORPORATED — $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalNEW COVENANT LEGAL SERVICES — $5,000 · Crime & LegalCONCORDANCE — $3,000 · Crime & LegalAIR & SPACE FORCES AID SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$246,800International$94,000Food & Nutrition$42,000Health$39,000Public Safety & Disaster$34,000Crime & Legal$28,000Public Benefit$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC — $88,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC — $39,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAIR & SPACE FORCES AID SOCIETY INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCarroll Education Foundation Inc — $19,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $9,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHANDICAPPED PETS FOUNDATION — $5,100 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetNEW COVENANT LEGAL SERVICES — $5,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYALL SQUAD INCORPORATED — $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAR BLUE SEA — $3,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCONCORDANCE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE OF HOPE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Janning Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph