Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Janice Gardner Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$712kHealth$465kHuman Services$306kFood & Nutrition$286kAnimals$176kInternational$88kEnvironment$40kArts & Culture$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $313k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $579k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE INTERFAITH CENTER$250,000
JACK'S CAREGIVER COALITION$75,000
Individual grant recipient$54,000
WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN$50,000
YOUTH FARM$50,000
CANDO CANINES$50,000
WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES$50,000
CANVAS HEALTH$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
WAYCROSS EVANGELICAL CHURCH$50,000
ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND$50,000
LOAVES & FISHES$50,000
HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA$40,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$40,000
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $324k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANVAS HEALTH: $50k → 6%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 17%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 23%BUCKHORN CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $14k → 27%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 17%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 23%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $50k → 14%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 17%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 23%BLUE STAR OF HOPE: $10k → 17%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $10k → 14%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $3k → 14%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $2k → 14%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $2k → 14%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $2k → 14%WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES: $2k → 14%KIDS AT RISK ACTION - KARA: $4k → 11%JACK'S CAREGIVER COALITION: $75k → 11%JACK'S CAREGIVER COALITION: $15k → 11%JACK'S CAREGIVER COALITION: $8k → 11%JACK'S CAREGIVER COALITION: $4k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $10k → 11%HOMEWARD BOUND: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IN
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 29 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
9

Total granted

$2.0M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+28%

Still filing today

69%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JACKS CAREGIVER COALITION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $101k · revenue +112%
  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $82k · revenue +122%
  • CD
    CAN DO CANINES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • PP
    PAW PADS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF THE CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • FC
    FRAUENSHUH CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
3
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
4
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

5
Families Rising

To amplify the voices of those with lived experience, support adoptive, foster, and kinship families, educate child welfare professionals, and champion the well-being of children and families. whether you are seeking guidance or working to…

Human Services
6
Mental Health Resources Inc

The mission of mental health resources is to foster hope, health and recovery for people affected by mental illness and substance use disorder.

7
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
8
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

9
Healtheast Woodwinds Hospital

Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.

Health
10
Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital

Provide quality, accessible, and valuable health care services via a hospital, home health agency, and clinic to the surrounding rural community.

Health
11
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
12
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kids At Risk Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnion Health and Welfare Fu…Professional Trade Associat…Youth Support ServicesCommunity Support ServicesYouth Sports LeaguesFood Assistance & Hunger Re…Disability Services & Emplo…Christian Gospel MinistriesLabor Union LocalsRegional Business Chambers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%3%<5yr12%3%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr16%22%35–55yr18%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%9%<5yr12%1%5–10yr20%40%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr18%13%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
10%
3,829/38,956

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOPE INTERFAITH CENTER — $560,000 · OtherHOPE INTERFAITH CENTERLOAVES & FISHES — $87,850 · OtherLOAVES & FISHESUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $81,850 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION INCCAN DO CANINES — $76,000 · OtherWAYCROSS EVANGELICAL CHURCH — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $69,000 · OtherALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherYouth Farm and Market Project — $62,500 · OtherPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Other+17 more — $311,430 · Other+17 moreJACKS CAREGIVER COALITION — $101,000 · Human ServicesJACKS CAREGIVER…BLUE STAR OF HOPE — $70,000 · Human ServicesBLUE STAR OF HO…WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES — $69,000 · Human ServicesWINGSPAN LIFE R…CANVAS HEALTH INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCANVAS HEALTH I…COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesBUCKHORN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,802 · Human ServicesFairview Foundation — $155,000 · HealthFairview Fou…Washburn Center for Children — $50,000 · HealthWashburn Cen…RAKHMA INC — $22,500 · HealthRAKHMA INCHELP HOSPITALIZED VETERANS INC — $15,000 · HealthHELP HOSPITA…+2 more — $12,000 · HealthHUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA — $60,000 · Food & NutritionMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $59,000 · Food & NutritionTHE RYAN MATHIS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP ODAYIN — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsEVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC — $35,000 · Public BenefitGIVING VOICE INITIATIVE — $34,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,503,630Human Services$323,802Health$254,500Food & Nutrition$119,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Public Benefit$35,000Arts & Culture$34,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFairview Foundation — $155,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetJACKS CAREGIVER COALITION — $101,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $81,850 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCAN DO CANINES — $76,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetBLUE STAR OF HOPE — $70,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetWINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES — $69,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Farm and Market Project — $62,500 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetHUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $59,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWashburn Center for Children — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANVAS HEALTH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC ELDERCARE — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGIVING VOICE INITIATIVE — $34,500 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $25,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RYAN MATHIS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetCAMP ODAYIN — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRAKHMA INC — $22,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetRAINFOREST FLOW — $18,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHELP HOSPITALIZED VETERANS INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC — $14,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBUCKHORN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWomen's Foundation of Minnesota — $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREACH FOR RESOURCES INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND INC — $1,802 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairview Foundation
  • Who funds JACKS CAREGIVER COALITION
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES
  • Who funds BLUE STAR OF HOPE
  • Who funds WINGSPAN LIFE RESOURCES
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Youth Farm and Market Project
  • Who funds HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA
  • Who funds METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children
  • Who funds CANVAS HEALTH INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC ELDERCARE
  • Who funds EVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC
  • Who funds GIVING VOICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
  • Who funds THE RYAN MATHIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAMP ODAYIN
  • Who funds RAKHMA INC
  • Who funds RAINFOREST FLOW
  • Who funds HELP HOSPITALIZED VETERANS INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC
  • Who funds BUCKHORN CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Women's Foundation of Minnesota
  • Who funds ANGEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN25.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Wca Foundation · Bentson Foundation · Allina Health System

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Janice Gardner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Janice Gardner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Janice Gardner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph