Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The James & Glenys Slavik Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$465k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Education$530kHealth$325kCrime & Legal$135kHuman Services$117kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kFood & Nutrition$45kAnimals$33kReligion$10kInternational$10kOther$514k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OC SHERIFF'S ADVISORY COUNCIL$100,000
EDNOVATE$50,000
PROJECT HOPE ALLIANCE$50,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK ORANGE COU$49,850
UC IRVINE FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST$25,000
TEAM RUBICON$25,000
MAUI FOOD BANK$15,000
CASA FOR CHILDREN - ORANGE COUNTY$10,000
HOPE IGNITES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$10,000
OC PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS ASSN$10,000
UNSILENCED PROJECT INC$10,000
BASE 11$10,000
AUGIE'S QUEST TO CURE ALS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%OC FIRE AUTHORITY-BENEVOLENT ASSOCI: $5k → 10%OC FIRE AUTHORITY-BENEVOLENT ASSOCI: $3k → 10%OC FIRE AUTHORITY-BENEVOLENT ASSOCI: $3k → 10%OC FIRE AUTHORITY-BENEVOLENT ASSOCI: $3k → 10%OC FIRE AUTHORITY-BENEVOLENT ASSOCI: $3k → 10%OC FIRE AUTHORITY-BENEVOLENT ASSOCI: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of The James & Glenys Slavik Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 81% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The James & Glenys Slavik Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 22 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
5

Total granted

$1.5M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-3%

Still filing today

82%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    EDNOVATE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +75%
  • PH
    Project Hope Alliance
    6× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +63%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -3%
  • UC
    USC COLLEGE PREP-SANTA ANA
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • GF
    GREAT FOREST MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
5
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
6
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
Fire Family Foundation

The mission of the fire family foundation is to provide support and financial assistance to firefighters and their families in times of need.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
12
California Fire Safe Council Inc

To lead california communities in wildfire risk reduction and resiliency.

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Decorative Arts Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyNative Hawaiian Community S…University Support Foundati…Independent Schools and Pre…Affordable Housing Developm…Land and Watershed Conserva…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%8%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr12%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%4%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%38%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr12%8%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
15%
12,636/83,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EDNOVATE INC — $250,000 · EducationEDNOVATE INCProject Hope Alliance — $175,000 · EducationProject Hope AllianceCenter for Innovations in Education — $60,000 · EducationCenter for Innovations in Educati…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK ORANGE COU — $344,250 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK ORANGE COUCASA FOR CHILDREN - ORANGE COUNTY — $40,000 · OtherCASA FOR CHILDREN - ORANGE COUNTYUSC COLLEGE PREP-SANTA ANA — $35,000 · OtherUSC COLLEGE PREP-SANTA ANASHERMAN LIBRARY GARDENS — $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $30,000 · Other+10 more — $88,000 · Other+10 moreHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDA…ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC — $80,000 · HealthANGEL FLIGHT WEST IN…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $50,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'…KURE IT INC — $30,000 · HealthKURE IT INCAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $15,000 · HealthORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL — $100,000 · Crime & LegalUNSILENCED PROJECT INC — $35,000 · Crime & LegalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $65,000 · Human ServicesDECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY — $34,000 · Human ServicesOrange County Fire Authority Benevolent Association — $17,500 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC — $80,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $45,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$530,000Other$567,250Health$325,000Crime & Legal$135,000Human Services$116,500Public Safety & Disaster$80,000Food & Nutrition$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEDNOVATE INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetProject Hope Alliance — $175,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL — $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Innovations in Education — $60,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNSILENCED PROJECT INC — $35,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetDECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY — $34,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetKURE IT INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Fire Authority Benevolent Association — $17,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $17,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAugies Quest to Cure ALS Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT FOREST MINISTRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHOPE IGNITES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The James & Glenys Slavik Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James & Glenys Slavik Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The James & Glenys Slavik Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph