Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James G Boswell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$24MHealth$14MFood & Nutrition$7.8MCrime & Legal$4.5MCivil Rights$1.4MScience & Tech$700kPhilanthropy$434kEnvironment$430kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $558k
  • $250k+8 grants · $6.8M
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$142M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 100% of reported assets are held in J G Boswell.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$2,000,000
HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL$2,000,000
AG ONE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$500,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$500,000
CALIFORNIA FFA FOUNDATION$300,000
CALIFORNIA FFA FOUNDATION$300,000
CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$250,000
CORCORAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$183,200
HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR AG IN THE CLASSROOM$100,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$100,000
CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER$75,000
CORCORAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$35,000
SEQUOIA RIVERLANDS TRUST$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER: $75k → 10%AMA OLUKAI FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%GOLDEN STATE YMCA: $100k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The James G Boswell Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The James G Boswell Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 44 repeat orgs$5.4M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
17

Total granted

$44M
$3.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +136%
  • CA
    CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +32% · 28% of their budget
  • VC
    VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TT
    The Thacher School Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.5M · revenue +32%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +13%
  • CU
    CALF - UNIVERSITY SUPPORT
    one grant, 2023 · $300k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Agricultural Foundation of California State University Fresno

Agricultural education at california state university, fresno.

—
2
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
3
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
4
California Farm Bureau Scholarship Foundation

Promote ag education with university scholarships.

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Cal State Fullerton Philanthropic Foundation

To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.

Philanthropy
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
9
California Bountiful Foundation

To advance public awareness, education, and understanding of california agriculture.

Environment
10
California State University Los Angeles Foundation

To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…

Education
11
California Farm Bureau Federation

To implement policies and develop work programs that will improve the financial well-being and quality of life of california farmers and ranchers.

—
12
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom; the most unlike its peers is Ama Olukai Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
23/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JU…The Thacher School Inc: $1,500,000 · EducationThe Thacher School IncAG ONE: $1,100,000 · EducationFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $1,000,000 · Education+7 more: $1,355,000 · Education+7 morePasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $6,500,000 · HealthPasadena Hospital Association…VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $3,500,000 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITALVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE …HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $1,600,000 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH I…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $500,000 · Health+2 more: $252,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $2,900,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA FUTURE …CORCORAN COMMUNITY SUPPORTING ORG: $1,450,000 · OtherCORCORAN COMMUNITY…COL JAMES G BOSWELL SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $1,063,000 · OtherCOL JAMES G BOSWEL…CA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $600,000 · OtherCA AGRICULTURAL LE…Individual grant recipient: $550,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…AUSCOTT LIMITED SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $501,554 · OtherAUSCOTT LIMITED SC…+36 more: $1,981,726 · Other+36 morePacific Legal Foundation: $4,275,000 · Crime & LegalCALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND: $3,700,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $30,000 · Food & NutritionCORCORAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $427,551 · Philanthropy+1 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyAMA OLUKAI FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesGolden State YMCA: $100,000 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER: $75,000 · Human Services
Education$22,955,000Health$14,352,000Other$9,046,280Crime & Legal$4,275,000Food & Nutrition$3,730,000Philanthropy$433,551Human Services$275,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000,000 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $6,500,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $4,275,000 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND: $3,700,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $3,500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $2,900,000 over 8y, 52% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $1,600,000 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc: $1,500,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetAG ONE: $1,100,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $700,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOJAI VALLEY SCHOOL: $500,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORCORAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $427,551 over 3y, 30% of budgetSUN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM: $225,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetSequoia Riverlands Trust: $215,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetPW LITCHFIELD HERITAGE CENTER: $200,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE KINGS FAIR PLEDGE FOUNDATION INC: $101,720 over 7y, 22% of budgetAMA OLUKAI FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetLegacy Christian Academy: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGolden State YMCA: $100,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTulare County Sheriffs Foundation: $97,500 over 3y, 59% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER: $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCollege of the Sequoias Foundation: $39,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFriends of the Kern County Fair: $35,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $34,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTULARE COUNTY FOUNDATION FOR AG EDUCATION AND YOUTH: $30,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSustainable Conservation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGirl Scouts of Central California South Inc: $17,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTULARE COUNTY FAIR HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE KENAN-FLAGLER BUSINESS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL EASTERN CALIFORNIA DBA UNITED WAY OF KERN COUNTY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF THE SEQUOIAS dba IMAGINE U CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSCOTT KIRSCHENMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKINGS COUNTY FARM BUREAU INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds The Thacher School Inc ↗
  • Who funds AG ONE ↗
  • Who funds FLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds OJAI VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds CORCORAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM ↗
  • Who funds Sequoia Riverlands Trust ↗
  • Who funds PW LITCHFIELD HERITAGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE KINGS FAIR PLEDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMA OLUKAI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Legacy Christian Academy ↗
  • Who funds Golden State YMCA ↗
  • Who funds Tulare County Sheriffs Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds College of the Sequoias Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Kern County Fair ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TULARE COUNTY FOUNDATION FOR AG EDUCATION AND YOUTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Land O'Lakes FoundationMN21× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · Kern Community Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Resnick Foundation · Educational Employees Credit Union · The Otis Booth Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James G Boswell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James G Boswell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James G Boswell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The James G Boswell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James G Boswell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph