Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$69kHuman Services$60kEducation$39kYouth Development$25kAnimals$13kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$6kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$431k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO$10,000
FOOD BANK OF ABILENE$4,000
BOBS AKA BREAKFAST ON BEECH STREET$3,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$3,000
NOAH PROJECT$2,000
DAY NURSERY OF ABILENE$2,000
LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES$2,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ABILENE$2,000
PHOENIX HOUSE$1,000
FAITH WORKS OF ABILENE INC$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,000
SERENITY FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$1,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$1,000
GROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 22%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 22%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 22%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 22%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 22%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 22%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 22%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 22%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$221k · 15 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$221k
$1k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    Food Bank of West Central Texas
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +47%
  • DN
    Day Nursery of Abilene Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +35%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PHOENIX HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
2
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
3
Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc

Pregnancy Resources' mission is to inspire hope and unconditionally love everyone we serve by empowering them to thrive through compassionate support and positive solutions.

Civil Rights
4
Abigail's Place

Committed to supporting displaced single mothers in Fort Bend County by providing housing assistance and wraparound services.

Housing & Shelter
5
Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

—
6
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
7
Habitat for Humanity Abilene Inc

Construct and/or rehabilitate houses for sale to low- and moderate-income families who qualify for home ownership. Homes are sold for an affordable mortgage.

Housing & Shelter
8
A Bridge to Opportunity Inc

To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault

Housing & Shelter
9
Family Promise of Bryan-College Station

To assist homeless families in securing stable housing

Housing & Shelter
10
Texoma Family Shelter

Feed and house homeless families, counsel and help them prepare for job interviews, assist in completing forms for govt assistance, and provide rent/utilities assistance. Coordinate with local food bank.

Human Services
11
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
12
West Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc

To support and compliment the work of Workforce Solutions of West Central Texas Board, which is responsible for the planning, oversight, and evaluation of a consolidated workforce system for the 19 County West Central Texas region.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Day Nursery of Abilene Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO: $38,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASOBOBS AKA BREAKFAST ON BEECH STREET: $24,500 · OtherBOBS AKA BREAKFAST ON BEECH STREETDay Nursery of Abilene Inc: $23,000 · OtherDay Nursery of Abilene IncNOAH PROJECT INC: $16,000 · OtherNOAH PROJECT INCGROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUND: $13,000 · OtherGROVER NELSON PARK ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ABILENE: $12,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF ABILENEJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $8,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTSALVATION ARMY: $8,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS: $21,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELSLove & Care Ministries: $13,000 · Human ServicesLove & Care Minis…Food Bank of West Central Texas: $23,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank o…Serenity Foundation of Texas: $8,000 · HealthAbilene Hope Haven Inc: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterFaithworks of Abilene Inc: $2,000 · Education
Other$149,000Human Services$34,000Food & Nutrition$23,000Health$8,000Housing & Shelter$6,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $23,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDay Nursery of Abilene Inc: $23,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $21,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetNOAH PROJECT INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLove & Care Ministries: $13,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSerenity Foundation of Texas: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Hope Haven Inc: $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFaithworks of Abilene Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Food Bank of West Central Texas ↗
  • Who funds Day Nursery of Abilene Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds NOAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Love & Care Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Serenity Foundation of Texas ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Hope Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds Faithworks of Abilene Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barber FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · Food Bank of West Central Texas · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · The Legett Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James Foundation Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James Foundation Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James’ filings →

    More from the funding graph