Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

The James Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
14
Grants FY2024
13
Organizations funded FY2023
8%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 14
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$431k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 8% of the organizations The James Foundation Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving14$34k7%
FY202313$33k8%
FY202212$25k0%
FY202114$29k7%
FY202013$27k0%
FY201913$25k0%
FY201813$24k8%
FY201712$26kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$69kHuman Services$60kEducation$39kYouth Development$25kAnimals$13kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$6kEmployment$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Food Bank of West Central Texas$23,00080%
Day Nursery of Abilene Inc$23,00070%
Meals on Wheels$21,00082%
Noah Project Inc$16,00080%
Love & Care Ministries$13,00080%
Serenity Foundation of Texas$8,00080%
Abilene Hope Haven Inc$6,00050%
Faithworks of Abilene Inc$2,00020%
The Phoenix House Inc$1,0001n/a

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($109k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The James Foundation Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $23,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDay Nursery of Abilene Inc: $23,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels: $21,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetNoah Project Inc: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLove & Care Ministries: $13,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSerenity Foundation of Texas: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Hope Haven Inc: $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFaithworks of Abilene Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barber FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Greathouse Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · Food Bank of West Central Texas · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · The Legett Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The James Foundation Charitable Trust with peer funders

About The James Foundation Charitable Trust

How much does The James Foundation Charitable Trust give?
The James Foundation Charitable Trust reported 14 grants totaling $34,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 14 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The James Foundation Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (31%), Human Services (27%), Education (17%).
Who are The James Foundation Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Food Bank of West Central Texas ($23k), Day Nursery of Abilene Inc ($23k), Meals on Wheels ($21k).
Does The James Foundation Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The James Foundation Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The James Foundation Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Barber Foundation, Greathouse Foundation, Shelton Family Foundation.
Where is The James Foundation Charitable Trust based?
The James Foundation Charitable Trust is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James’ filings →

More from the funding graph