Skip to content

· Public charity

The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system.

$737k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$926kEmployment$205kCommunity Improvement$175kFood & Nutrition$132kEnvironment$20kEducation$20kArts & Culture$15kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $737,358 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $717,358 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEE INITIATIVE INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PIONEER VALLEY WORKS CENTER: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
NM
KS
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 64% of The James Beard Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The James Beard Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
2
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
3
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Work on Climate

Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.

Environment
5
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
6
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
9
American Culinary Federation Education Foundation Inc

To provide for education, scholarships and other charitable purposes related to the culinary profession

—
10
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
11
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
12
Portland Farmers Market

Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund; the most unlike its peers is Wine Empowered Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW VENTURE FUND: $915,943 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND: $150,000 · EnvironmentSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND+1 more: $6,500 · EnvironmentROCKSTAR DOUGH LLC: $15,000 · OtherPARLOR ATLANTA LLC: $15,000 · OtherBG ANDERSON LLC: $15,000 · OtherNUSSLI 118 LLC: $15,000 · OtherFISHSCALE INC: $15,000 · OtherSKYDANCE BREWING COMPANY INC: $15,000 · OtherWATERBIRD CATERING LLC: $15,000 · OtherNUI KAELOHA INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE NOURISH SPOT: $15,000 · OtherGOODIES FROZEN CUSTARD AND TREATS: $15,000 · OtherHOTVILLE CHICKEN LLC: $15,000 · OtherMARKETING TOGETHER LLC: $15,000 · OtherTINA ARCHULETA: $15,000 · OtherSAMMYS AVENUE EATERY LLC: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherWAHPEPAHS KITCHEN LLC: $15,000 · OtherUNCLE WILLIE GREEN WINGS: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherMORNING LIGHT LLC: $15,000 · OtherCREDENTIALS SOCIAL CLUB: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherSPIRIT MOUNTAIN BREWING & ROASTING LLC: $15,000 · OtherPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $5,160 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $5,000 · PhilanthropyZERO FOODPRINT: $20,000 · Food & NutritionNorth American Traditional Indigenous Food Systems: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $5,000 · Food & NutritionLEE INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 · EmploymentWINE EMPOWERED INC: $5,000 · EmploymentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLA COCINA: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Environment$1,072,443Other$360,000Philanthropy$40,160Food & Nutrition$35,000Employment$25,000International$20,000Human Services$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $915,943 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZERO FOODPRINT: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLA COCINA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth American Traditional Indigenous Food Systems: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $5,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINE EMPOWERED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds SIXTEEN THIRTY FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ZERO FOODPRINT ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER VALLEY WORKERS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LA COCINA ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds North American Traditional Indigenous Food Systems ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds WINE EMPOWERED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James Beard Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James Beard Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc: 53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James Beard’s filings →

More from the funding graph