Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2026
7
Organizations funded FY2025
57%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$500
Largest grant, FY2026
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 7
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
4
Total assets, FY2026
$2.2M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 57% of the organizations The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 16% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving8$122k50%
FY20257$136k57%
FY20245$140k60%
FY20237$32k86%
FY20222$100k0%
FY20212$200k0%
FY20204$161k25%
FY20194$193k25%
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$595kHuman Services$364kPhilanthropy$229kHousing & Shelter$50kRecreation & Sports$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($635k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShady Side Academy: $595,500 over 10y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwestern University: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men and Women's Hebrew Association and Irene Kaufmann Cent: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWashington University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFox Families Care: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJewish Community Center of Si Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreakthrough Bike Challenge: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHomeless Children's Foundation of Indian River County Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMartha's Vineyard Museum Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation with peer funders

About The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation

How much does The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation give?
The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $127,350 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 7 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2026, its largest causes are Education (43%), Human Services (26%), Philanthropy (17%).
Who are The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2026: Shady Side Academy ($596k), Northwestern University ($42k), Young Men and Women's Hebrew Association and Irene Kaufmann Cent ($25k).
Does The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation based?
The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Nancy Wolf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph