Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$595kPhilanthropy$161kRecreation & Sports$43kHuman Services$37kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$1kArts & Culture$250Other$539k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$55,000
SHADY SIDE ACADEMY$55,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FOX FAMILIES CARE$10,000
UNITED JEWISH FED OF UTAH (ANNUAL)$5,000
PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH BIKE CHALLENGE$1,000
WASATCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF STATEN ISLAND: $1k → 11%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%FOX FAMILIES CARE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+11%

Still filing today

33%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHADY SIDE ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $570k · revenue +45%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $329k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $105k

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +44%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston

To advance the aspirations of families and individuals to enrich their lives, bodies and spirits, by providing the best in contemporary programs and experiences, informed by jewish values for today's jews and the people in their lives.

Human Services
2
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
5
Marcus Jewish Community Center of Atlanta Inc

To foster and ensure a vibrant greater Atlanta Jewish community by providing programs and services of distinction that attract, involve, and inspire meaningful connections and promote Jewish values.

Human Services
6
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
7
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
8
Mid-Island Y Jewish Community Center in

Provide vital services & foster jewish identity, personal growth, family strength and community. the mid-island y jcc is open to everyone in the community serving individuals of all ages, abilities, and challenges.

Human Services
9
Jewish Community Center of Greater Rochester Inc

The louis s. wolk jcc of greater rochester is deeply rooted in and committed to celebrating jewish traditions and values. we welcome the community at large to join together for exceptional events and activities that establish lifelong…

Human Services
10
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
11
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
12
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Park City Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough Bike Challenge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHADY SIDE ACADEMY — $569,500 · EducationSHADY SIDE ACADEMYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $328,500 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FEDERATION OF PITTSBURGH — $83,355 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PITTSBURGH+5 more — $22,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $150,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERA…PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COM…+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University — $42,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $25,000 · Human ServicesFox Families Care — $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SI INC — $1,250 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $1,000 · Food & NutritionPeople's Health Clicnic — $1,000 · HealthMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $250 · Arts & Culture
Education$594,500Other$538,855Philanthropy$160,500Recreation & Sports$43,000Human Services$36,750Food & Nutrition$1,000Health$1,000Arts & Culture$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY — $569,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SI INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWasatch Community Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The James and Nancy Wolf Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph