Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James and Laura Rogers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$763k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$4.8MArts & Culture$1.2MAnimals$1.0MFood & Nutrition$750kYouth Development$500kHousing & Shelter$500kHuman Services$236kReligion$140kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - ATHLETICS FOUNDATION$762,500
KINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC$300,000
BARTER FOUNDATION$250,000
SYMPHONY OF THE MOUNTAINS$100,000
NETHERLAND INN AND BOATYARD HISTORIC SITE$100,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER KINGSPORT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HOPE HOUSE: $37k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 15 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$8.3M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SYMPHONY OF THE MOUNTAINS
    6× · 2018–2025 · $524k · revenue +64% · 32% of their budget
  • BS
    Boy Scouts of America Council 713 Sequoyah
    2× · 2017–2019 · $500k · revenue +18%
  • KH
    KINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k · revenue +722% · 75% of their budget

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2022 · $750k
  • SM
    SMALL MIRACLES
    one grant, 2022 · $109k
  • TN
    THE NETHERLAND INN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $86k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hawkins County Humane Society Inc

Providing a safe and humane animal shelter for unwanted animals in Hawkins County.

Animals
2
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
3
Family Promise of Greater Kingsport

Case management, daycenter, guest support, rapid rehousing, homeless prevention and transportation for homeless families with children.

Housing & Shelter
4
Casa of Robertson County Inc

To provide court-appointed special advocates to child victims of abuse and neglect. The programs vision is a safe, permanent, loving home for every child it serves.

Human Services
5
Casa of Northeast Tennessee

Advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Crime & Legal
6
Berkeley County Humane Society

Animal welfare

Animals
7
Kennebec Valley Humane Society

To care for, protect and place animals for adoption in lifelong homes, and to prevent cruelty to animals by educating our community in the proper and humane care of animals

Animals
8
Sevier County Animal Shelter

Public welfare, specifically the rescue and temporary housing of dogs, cats, and other animals. To reunite lost pets with their owners and match homeless pets with a loving family.

Animals
9
Kingman County Humane Society

Our mission is to prevent cruelty, abuse, and negligence of animals and to promote the humane treatment of all animals by educating the general public, establishing subsidized spay and neuter programs, providing shelter to lost and…

Animals
10
Kentucky Equine Humane Center Inc

The mission of the kentucky equine humane center, inc (kyehc) is to create second chances for kentucky's equines through care, retraingin, and adoption, while educating the public to ensure every horse thrives.

Animals
11
Casa of the Tennessee Heartland Inc

Provide advocacy for abused and neglected children in juvenile court.

Civil Rights
12
Keystone Place Inc

Homeless shelter for families and single adults.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Kingsport Inc; the most unlike its peers is Petworks Animal Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - ATHLETICS FOUNDATION: $2,762,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - ATHLETICS FOUNDATIONPETWORKS KINGSPORT: $1,000,000 · OtherPETWORKS KINGSPORTBAYS MOUNTAIN PARK AND PLANETARIUM: $1,000,000 · OtherBAYS MOUNTAIN PARK AND PLANETARIUMUNIVERSITY OF VA FUND: $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VA FUNDSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $750,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKSYMPHONY OF THE MOUNTAINS: $524,300 · OtherSYMPHONY OF THE MOUNTAINSBARTER FOUNDATION INC STATE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA: $480,650 · OtherBARTER FOUNDATION INC STATE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA+15 more: $881,037 · Other+15 moreKINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE: $36,500 · Human ServicesBoy Scouts of America Council 713 Sequoyah: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRONTIER HEALTH: $90,319 · HealthCASA for Kids Inc: $59,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WAY OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CARMEL SCHOOL: $18,898 · EducationPetworks Animal Services Inc: $5,500 · Animals
Other$8,398,487Human Services$536,500Youth Development$500,000Health$90,319Civil Rights$59,000Philanthropy$30,000Education$18,898Animals$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSYMPHONY OF THE MOUNTAINS: $524,300 over 6y, 32% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Council 713 Sequoyah: $500,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetKINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC: $500,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetBARTER FOUNDATION INC STATE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA: $480,650 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetKINGSPORT CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $150,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetKINGSPORT LIFESAVING AND FIRST AID CREW INC: $129,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetFRONTIER HEALTH: $90,319 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA for Kids Inc: $59,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE: $36,500 over 1y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CARMEL SCHOOL: $18,898 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKingsport Area Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPetworks Animal Services Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SYMPHONY OF THE MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America Council 713 Sequoyah ↗
  • Who funds KINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTER FOUNDATION INC STATE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds KINGSPORT CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KINGSPORT LIFESAVING AND FIRST AID CREW INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CASA for Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARMEL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Kingsport Area Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds Petworks Animal Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Kingsport IncTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kingsport Inc · Eastman Credit Union · Eastman Foundation · Food City Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James and Laura Rogers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James and Laura Rogers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Laura Rogers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph