· Private foundation
The Jagdish and Usha Patil Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of The Jagdish and Usha Patil Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Baptist Health Foundation | $20,000 |
| Gosumec Foundation USA | $5,000 |
| Fine Arts Association | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Williamsburg Relief Fund | $1,000 |
| Corbin Community Backpack Program | $1,000 |
| Cornerstone Christian School | $1,000 |
| Southeast Kentucky Empty Stocking Fund | $1,000 |
| White Flag Ministry-First Baptist Church | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Kidz Korner Party & Play | $550 |
| BTCC | $502 |
| Music Alumni Association | $500 |
| Lions Club of Corbin | $500 |
| Corbin Rotary Club | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGOSUMEC FOUNDATION USA2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +289%
- BTBHARTIYA TEMPLE & CULTURAL CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +36%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- BFBaptist Foundationone grant, 2022 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- WSWE SERVE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Primary objective of SONGJOGFOUNDATION is to provide education, skill based training and healthcare to the underprivileged and underserved communities. Education program consists of fellowships, scholarships, food for education, orphanage…
Support and Research Major Problems in Child Health Globally
Kolkata Foundation is a global non-profit organization working to improve lives of the underprivileged through high impact social interventions in Education, Women's Empowerment and Healthcare. It is a call to action to unite, give, change…
Founded on the unshakable belief that all humans are equal, and every newborn has equal potential to fulfill life's promises, save the hearts delivers cutting edge and free medical treatment to the poorest children afflicted by congenital…
Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)
Purpose of sanskruti foundation is to collect, send and distribute financial aid as well as food, medical supplies, new and used clothing and books, etc. to the needy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shruti Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 21% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOSUMEC FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Corbin Inc ↗
- Who funds CORBIN COMMUNITY BACKPACK PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BHARTIYA TEMPLE & CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JNANA PRABODHINI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Kentucky Empty Stocking Fund INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jagdish and Usha Patil Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Shadaj Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.