Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jacoby Chiel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$52kRecreation & Sports$51kHealth$27kInternational$21kArts & Culture$9kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$4kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$332k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH$3,000
HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH$3,000
CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND$3,000
HADASSAH$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADORN$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ROFEH INTERNATIONAL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE$1,000
BOSTON JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL$1,000
RAMAH DAY CAMP$1,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,000
SCHECHTER INSTITUTES$500
FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $13k → 7%BOSTON JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 8%COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES: $3k → 16%RAMAH DAY CAMP: $1k → 22%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%CAMP RAMAH IN NYACK NY: $1k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 17%ETZION FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $8k → 7%BOSTON JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 8%YAD CHESSED: $5k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%CAMP RAMAH IN NYACK NY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND: $3k → 7%SOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER BOSTON: $3k → 8%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $3k → 11%YAD CHESSED: $3k → 16%HADASSAH: $2k → 17%HADASSAH: $2k → 17%HADASSAH: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 16 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$193k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+20%

Still filing today

38%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionRecreation & SportsEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +99%
  • RI
    ROFEH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +106%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • EF
    ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • GA
    GATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +17%
  • BO
    BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
The Jerusalem Connection
—
5
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
8
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
—
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Boundless Israel Inc

The organization is a think-action tank partnering with community leaders to revitalize israel education and take bold collective action to combat jew-hatred.

Education
11
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
12
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Abraham Initiatives Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rofeh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAH: $27,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHEL SARAHHIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCH: $27,000 · OtherHIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION FOR LYSOSOMAL STORAGE DISEASE RESEARCHHADASSAH: $12,000 · OtherHADASSAHBOSTON JEWISH FILM INC: $9,000 · OtherBOSTON JEWISH FILM INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROFEH INC: $9,000 · OtherROFEH INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADORN: $6,000 · OtherRAMAH DAY CAMP: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $10,190 · Other+5 moreCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $42,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGL…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $6,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,750 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 · International+1 more: $250 · InternationalETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $5,000 · ReligionBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 · ReligionHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $250 · ReligionCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $500 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $1,750 · EnvironmentGATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$143,190Recreation & Sports$42,000International$12,500Religion$6,250Philanthropy$3,500Environment$1,750Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $42,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON JEWISH FILM INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetROFEH INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON JEWISH FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Rosalyn and Richard Slifka Charitable Trust · Joseph and Rae Gann Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jacoby Chiel Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jacoby Chiel Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Gateways Access to Jewish Education Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jacoby Chiel Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jacoby Chiel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jacoby Chiel’s filings →

More from the funding graph