Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Jacobs Center for Neighborhood Innovation

The mission of THE JACOBS CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD INNOVATION is to foster a thriving community envisioned and realized by its residents.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Community Improvement$172kInternational$20kCivil Rights$17kEducation$15kHuman Services$13kEmployment$6kArts & Culture$5kOther$111k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $52,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $72,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$27,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT$27,500
HARVEY FAMILY FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Urban Partnership

The California Urban Partnership's (CUP) mission is to build economic security in communities of color through policy research, education and organizing community action. We advocate for systems changes that increase investments to improve…

Community Improvement
2
Urban League of San Diego County

Assist African Americans and other underserved people in San Diego County to acheive social and economic equality through advocacy, bridge building, program services and research.

3
APIs Mobilize

APIs Mobilize seeks to cultivate greater participation of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in public service through educational opportunities.

Youth Development
4
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
5
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
6
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
7
Black American Political Association of California San Dieg

The San Diego Chapter of the Black American Political Association of California, BAPAC SD, works to ensure the economic, social, and political force of the Black community in San Diego County remains relevant.

Civil Rights
8
Herencia Hispana San Diego

Unite all latino americans

Membership Benefit
9
Water Education for Latino Leaders

Well educates and trains local latino elected officials about california water policy to promote timely and equitable actions that serve to develop a robust economy, healthy communities, and a resilient environment for all californians.

Human Services
10
Urban League of the Greater San Francisco Bay Area

The Urban League of the Greater San Francisco Bay Area pursues a mission to enable African-Americans, other minorities and the underserved to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power, social equality and civil rights. The Organization…

Community Improvement
11
Partners in College Success

Partners in College Success (PiCS) ensures equal access to higher education and an equitable college experience for low-income, refugee, immigrant, foster, homeless and disadvantaged youth in San Diego County. PiCS provides dedicated,…

Education
12
California Black Power Network Action Fund

Promote social welfare thru political policy

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Building Skills Partnership and the most unlike its peers is Black American Political Association of California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $108,625 · Community ImprovementLOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONTHE URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT DBA URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT — $27,500 · Community ImprovementTHE URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT DBA URBAN COLLABORATIV…ACCESSITY — $21,000 · Community ImprovementACCESSITYRISE Urban Leadership Institute of San Diego — $15,000 · Community ImprovementRISE Urban Leadership Institute of San DiegoHarvey Family Foundation — $25,000 · OtherHarvey Family FoundationSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT — $15,625 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST…SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $15,625 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN COLLEGESOUTHEAST ALANO CLUB — $9,625 · OtherSOUTHEAST ALANO CLUBKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $8,135 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODHOUSE OF RESTORATION INC — $7,500 · OtherHOUSE OF RESTORATION INCCOOK CASA INC — $7,500 · OtherCOOK CASA INCPEOPLES ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE ADVOCATES — $7,500 · OtherPEOPLES ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE ADVO…MUSLIM LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO INC — $7,125 · OtherMUSLIM LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF SAN DI…SAN DIEGO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $7,125 · OtherSAN DIEGO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT…ACCION INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 · InternationalBlack American Political Association of California — $16,500 · Civil RightsFIRST GEN SCHOLARS — $15,000 · EducationUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES — $12,600 · Human ServicesBuilding Skills Partnership — $5,875 · EmploymentOur Genetic Legacy Inc — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$172,125Other$110,760International$20,000Civil Rights$16,500Education$15,000Human Services$12,600Employment$5,875Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOGAN HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $108,625 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetTHE URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT DBA URBAN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT — $27,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHarvey Family Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetACCESSITY — $21,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBlack American Political Association of California — $16,500 over 1y, 81% of budgetRISE Urban Leadership Institute of San Diego — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFIRST GEN SCHOLARS — $15,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUNION OF PAN ASIAN COMMUNITIES — $12,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $8,135 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLES ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE ADVOCATES — $7,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetBuilding Skills Partnership — $5,875 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOur Genetic Legacy Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA22.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · United Way of San Diego County · Sempra Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jacobs Center for Neighborhood Innovation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jacobs Center for Neighborhood Innovation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jacobs Center for Neighborhood Innovation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph