Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Fndt

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$613kHealth$151kEducation$90kHuman Services$40kAnimals$10kFood & Nutrition$6kReligion$5kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $260k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY$100,000
NEW YORK STAGE & FILM$60,000
NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA$50,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$50,000
AMERICAN THEATRE WING$32,500
LINCOLN CENTER PATRONS$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
PRIMARY STAGES$10,000
CHABAD OF BEDFORD$5,000
THE SCHOOLHOUSE THEATRE$1,000
LANCASTER CHILDREN'S HOME$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$522k · 10 repeat orgs$497k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$522k
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+2%

Still filing today

70%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $207k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionInternationalRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    AMERICAN THEATRE WING INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $123k · revenue +3%
  • NY
    NEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +90%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $94k
  • CA
    CAF AMERICA FOR- KLIN THEATRE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • MH
    MARBEL HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
2
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
3
En Garde Arts Inc

To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…

Arts & Culture
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
6
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
7
Performance Space 122 Inc

See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…

Arts & Culture
8
Theaterworks Inc

Theaterworks' mission is to share intimate stories that engage all audiences. it creates exceptional contemporary theater that entertains, celebrates new voices, and invites meaningful conversations. its vision is to inspire a more…

Arts & Culture
9
Vineyard Theatre and Workshop Center Inc

Founded in 1981, vineyard theatre is an off-broadway theatre company dedicated to developing and producing new plays and musicals that push boundaries of what theatre can be and do. we seek to nurture a daring community of theatre makers…

Arts & Culture
10
Theatre for a New Audience Inc

The mission of theatre for a new audience is to develop and vitalize the performance and study of shakespeare and classic drama. the theatre is dedicated to the language and ideas of writers - to a dialogue over centuries between…

Arts & Culture
11
The City Theatre Company Inc

To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.

Arts & Culture
12
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Theatre Wing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Animal Nation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINCOLN CENTER PATRONS: $130,000 · OtherLINCOLN CENTER PATRONSWHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY: $100,000 · OtherWHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL ONCOLOGYIndividual grant recipient: $94,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF MARBLE HOUSE: $80,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MARBLE HOUSECAF AMERICA FOR- KLIN THEATRE: $50,000 · OtherCAF AMERICA FOR- KLIN THEATRENATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICAMARBEL HOUSE: $40,000 · OtherMARBEL HOUSENY PRESBITERIAN HOSPITAL - DR MIA TALMOUR: $40,000 · OtherNY PRESBITERIAN HOSPITAL - DR MIA TALMOUR+18 more: $50,900 · Other+18 moreAMERICAN THEATRE WING INC: $122,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN THEATRE WING INCNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INCPrimary Stages Company Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePrimary Stages Company IncMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $9,750 · Arts & CultureBARNARD COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationBARNARD CO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationAMERICAN F…ANIMAL NATION INC: $10,000 · AnimalsCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$634,900Arts & Culture$274,250Education$90,000Animals$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000International$3,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN THEATRE WING INC: $122,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC: $110,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPrimary Stages Company Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL NATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew DramatistsInc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN THEATRE WING INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK STAGE AND FILM INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Primary Stages Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL NATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds New DramatistsInc ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Shubert Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Fndt funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Fndt. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Fndt?

    Find your warmest path to The Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Fndt through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jack and Mimi Leviton Amsterdam Fndt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph