Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jack and Judy Brinson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$184k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.1MHealth$624kInternational$79kYouth Development$28kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$125,000
DUKE EYE CENTER$12,500
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$10,000
HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION$7,500
THE BASCUM$5,000
SAMITARIAN'S PURSE$2,500
LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS$2,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSONVILLE NC$2,500
WATER AT WORK MINISTRY INC$2,500
HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FUND$1,500
SMILE TRAIN$1,000
OUR LADY OF THE MOUNTAINS HIGHLANDS$1,000
SMILE TRAIN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $10k → 11%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%MISSION HEALTH FOUNDATION: $125k → 27%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HILTON HEAD: $3k → 10%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%HIGHLANDS CASHIER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 12%ST GERARD HOUSE: $25k → 12%United Way of Buncombe Asheville: $1k → 12%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $25k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 18%SAMITARIAN'S PURSE: $3k → 21%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%Mission Hospital Foundation: $50k → 27%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HILTON HEAD: $3k → 10%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%HighlandsCashiers Hospital Foundation: $13k → 12%ST GERARD HOUSE: $25k → 12%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $8k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $230k → 18%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%ST GERARD HOUSE: $3k → 12%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $8k → 12%Western Carolina University: $131k → 18%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%ST GERARD HOUSE: $3k → 12%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $5k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $130k → 18%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $5k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $125k → 18%THE BASCUM: $5k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $125k → 18%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 18%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 18%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $3k → 12%WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $39k → 18%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%LITERACY COUNCIL OF THE HIGHLANDS: $3k → 12%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $2k → 12%HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION: $2k → 12%HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FUND: $2k → 12%HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FUND: $2k → 12%HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FUND: $2k → 12%HIGHLANDS CASHIERS HEALTH FUND: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 12 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$2.7M
$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+136%
+274%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HB
    HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $57k · revenue +420%
  • SG
    St Gerard House
    4× · 2018–2021 · $55k · revenue +136%
  • WA
    WATER AT WORK MINISTRIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • MH
    MISSION HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $125k
  • MH
    MISSION HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +274%
  • HC
    HIGHLANDS CASHIER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gift of Life International Inc

To further the cause of world peace and understanding by facilitating free medical services, primarily to children suffering from heart defects and other similar or allied illnesses regardless of race, gender, creed, or national origin,…

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc

American lebanese syrian associated charities, inc. (alsac) was founded in 1957 and exists solely to raise funds and build awareness to sustain and grow the mission of st. jude children's research hospital, inc. to advance cures, and means…

Religion
4
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
5
Global Medical Training Gmt

Global medical training mission: north american physician, dr. wil johnson, md created this organization. dr. wil transitioned from 28 years of a rural private practice in the usa after deciding to lifetime volunteer his time and medical /…

International
6
Twin Missions International

Mission work

Health
7
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
8
Habib Alrahman Charity Foundation

The mission of habib alrahman charity foundation (hacf) is to establish a kideny center in sudan called hacf kidney center, which will help patients with kidney (renal)problems in sudan. kidney problems are very common in sudan and the…

Health
9
Saving Lives Initiatives Inc

Supplement the healthcare sector in SL

International
10
Siloam Health

Siloam shares the love of christ by providing affordable, whole-person care to the uninsured & underserved that addresses the physical, emotional, spiritual, & social determinants of health.

—
11
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
12
One World Surgery

One world surgery's mission is to ignite the spirit of service and transform lives by providing access to high-quality surgical care globally.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $2,110,350 · OtherWESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITYDUKE EYE CENTER: $342,500 · OtherDUKE EYE CENTERMISSION HEALTH FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Other+10 more: $72,500 · OtherMISSION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 · HealthHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $12,500 · HealthHIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION INC: $56,500 · InternationalWATER AT WORK MINISTRIES: $20,000 · InternationalSt Gerard House: $55,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationThe Bascom Corporation: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 · Religion
Other$2,650,350Health$78,500International$76,500Education$65,000Arts & Culture$5,000Religion$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION INC: $56,500 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetSt Gerard House: $55,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetWATER AT WORK MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIGHLANDS BOLIVIAN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Gerard House ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATER AT WORK MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Bascom Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jack and Judy Brinson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jack and Judy Brinson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jack and Judy Brinson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Jack and Judy Brinson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jack and Judy Brinson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph