Skip to content

· Private foundation

The J W & Mildred a Kisling Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2026still arriving
43
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$102kHealth$95kHuman Services$82kEducation$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kHousing & Shelter$22kYouth Development$20kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2026 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY SPIRIT RADIO FOUNDATION$6,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
OUR LITTLE HAVEN$3,000
CIRCLE OF CONCERNS$2,000
ONE CLASSROOM- ST LOUIS CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE$2,000
ST MARTHAS HALL$2,000
ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY$2,000
THE BACKSTOPPERS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSN$2,000
VITAE SOCIETY$1,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$1,000
FRIENDS RURAL PARISH WORKERS OF CHRIST$1,000
STL FIRST RESPONDER CANTEEN$1,000
SUSAN G KOMEN FOR CURE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $1k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $1k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $1k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $1k → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $2k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $1k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERNS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$514k · 56 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2026, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
7

Total granted

$514k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+71%

Still filing today

41%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOLY SPIRIT RADIO FOUNDATION INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $58k · revenue +122%
  • TB
    THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS
    10× · 2017–2026 · $26k · revenue +68%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY
    10× · 2017–2026 · $20k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TA
    TODAY AND TOMORROW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $50k
  • LH
    Lydia's House Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +71%
  • CR
    CAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
2
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
3
St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

Crime & Legal
4
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
5
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
6
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
7
St Luke's Health Foundation of Sioux City Iowa

To enhance the quality of life for the people of the siouxland region by obtaining funds in support of the health-care mission of st. luke's health system.

—
8
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

—
9
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
10
Casa of St Louis

Casa of st. louis advocates for abused and neglected children and youth in st. louis by representing their best interests in court and in the community. our vision is that every child lives in a safe permanent home and has the opportunity…

Civil Rights
11
St Patrick Apartments Inc

Inspired by jesus christ, st patrick apartments, inc. assists cardinal ritter senior services in providing compassionate care through a continuum of high quality residential healthcare and supportive social services. we bring the mission…

—
12
St James Place of Baton Rouge Foundation

St. james place foundation promotes compasssion through giving to advance living life well at st. james place.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery; the most unlike its peers is No Woman Left Behind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TODAY AND TOMORROW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTODAY AND TOMORROW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $26,000 · OtherTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUISIndividual grant recipient: $24,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $23,500 · OtherOUR LITTLE HAVENONE CLASSROOM- ST LOUIS CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE: $20,000 · OtherST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $20,000 · OtherVITAE SOCIETY: $13,000 · Other+44 more: $203,800 · Other+44 moreCIRCLE OF CONCERN: $18,500 · Human ServicesCIRCLE OF C…ST MARTHA'S HALL: $14,000 · Human ServicesST MARTHA'S…Little Sisters of The Poor: $11,500 · Human ServicesLittle Sist…ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGR: $11,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS TA…THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesHOLY SPIRIT RADIO FOUNDATION INC: $57,500 · ReligionHOLY SPIRIT…NO WOMAN LEFT BEHIND INC: $14,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $13,500 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $8,500 · HealthSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $13,500 · EducationACCESS ACADEMIES: $6,000 · EducationBEYOND HOUSING INC: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterLydia's House Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$380,800Human Services$58,000Religion$57,500Health$44,500Education$19,500Housing & Shelter$14,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLY SPIRIT RADIO FOUNDATION INC: $57,500 over 10y, 9.4% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $26,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $23,500 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $20,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF CONCERN: $18,500 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetST MARTHA'S HALL: $14,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNO WOMAN LEFT BEHIND INC: $14,000 over 7y, 41% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $13,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Sisters of The Poor: $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGR: $11,000 over 10y, 5.9% of budgetDUO DOGS INC: $9,500 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTOPHERS INC: $7,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS ACADEMIES: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLydia's House Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLY SPIRIT RADIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds ST MARTHA'S HALL ↗
  • Who funds NO WOMAN LEFT BEHIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds Little Sisters of The Poor ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS TAX ASSISTANCE PROGR ↗
  • Who funds DUO DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTOPHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds STARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO30.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pott Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Youthbridge Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Tsf

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The J W & Mildred a Kisling Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The J W & Mildred a Kisling Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The J W & Mildred a Kisling Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The J W & Mildred a Kisling Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J W & Mildred a Kisling’s filings →

    More from the funding graph