Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ivywood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$767k
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$5.0MEmployment$393kPublic Benefit$234kHuman Services$139kInternational$115kPhilanthropy$106kHealth$84kArts & Culture$72kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $261k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $310k
$3,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD WORKS INC$309,658
RECOVERY DIARIES$60,000
RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY PROJECT$50,000
GOOD WORKS INC$46,000
RESEARCH FOUNDATIN OF CUNY$30,000
PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND$30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FAT ACCEPTANCE$30,000
WORLDS FAIR FUND$20,000
PHILADELPHIA JOBS WITH JUSTICE$20,000
CHILDREN FIRST$15,000
VOLUNTEER ENGLISH PROGRAM$10,000
COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE$10,000
GLOBAL REFUGE$10,000
IOWA ABORTION ACCESS FUND$10,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN FIRST: $90k → 22%CHILDREN FIRST: $20k → 22%CHILDREN FIRST: $15k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $1k → 22%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $9k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
KS
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 60% of The Ivywood Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Ivywood Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$764k · 28 repeat orgs$823k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
25

Total granted

$764k
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

82%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $602k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DEBS-JONES-DOUGLASS INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +21%
  • CF
    Children First PA
    3× · 2022–2025 · $125k · revenue +33%
  • LI
    LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • JW
    JOBS WITH JUSTICE
    one grant, 2024 · $41k
  • TE
    THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • CP
    CIVITAS PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP
    one grant, 2024 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

11
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
12
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Share. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Government Accountability R…Elementary Literacy TutoringPregnancy Support ServicesJewish Community FederationsPublic Library SupportCommunity Arts OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Land Conservation Organizat…Native Hawaiian Community D…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%7%<5yr13%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr15%32%35–55yr17%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr15%5%35–55yr17%87%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/68
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,094

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
33/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $4,800,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA+4 more — $163,000 · EducationGOOD WORKS INC — $355,658 · OtherGOOD WORKS INCRIGHT TO DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $175,000 · OtherRIGHT TO DEMOCRACY …RECOVERY DIARIES — $60,000 · OtherLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE — $55,000 · OtherJOBS WITH JUSTICE — $40,585 · OtherTHE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION — $40,000 · Other+66 more — $412,950 · Other+66 moreChildren First PA — $125,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $60,000 · Human ServicesABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA — $9,000 · Human Services+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $30,000 · PhilanthropyPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $30,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY — $40,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $6,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA AREA JOBS WITH JUSTICE — $34,000 · EmploymentMissouri Workers Center — $3,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO ADVANCE FAT ACCEPTANCE INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT — $3,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $500 · Civil Rights
Education$4,963,000Other$1,139,193Human Services$198,000Philanthropy$60,000Arts & Culture$46,500Employment$37,000Civil Rights$33,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $4,800,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEBS-JONES-DOUGLASS INSTITUTE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetChildren First PA — $125,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA AREA JOBS WITH JUSTICE — $34,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO ADVANCE FAT ACCEPTANCE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetVOLUNTEER ENGLISH PROGRAM IN CHESTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA — $30,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDING FORWARD (FORMERLY THE UNION LEAGUE LEGACY FOUNDATION) — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED — $11,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD AND ENVIRONMENT REPORTING NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOMS FOUNDATION AT VALLEY FORGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA — $9,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBRARIES WITHOUT BORDERS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHistorical Society of Pennsylvania — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN CENTER FOR YOUTH JUSTICE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER PHILADELPHIA COALITION AGAINST HUNGER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPOTLIGHT PA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE — $1,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetThe Land Institute — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITIZENS CAMPAIGN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMake the Road New York — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA28.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · New Venture Fund · Valentine Foundation · Independence Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The Snider Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Philadelphia Health Partnership · The Nararo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ivywood Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge100% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ivywood Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ivywood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph