How much did PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

grandfamilymedical legalbuilding

2019

medical legaloutreachadvocacy

2020

hunger reliefcovid emergencycase managementbehavioralmedical-legalmembersbuilding

2021

protect well-beingmembers covidcovid pandemicwell-being membershousingsupportspartnerships

2022

well-being memberseducation well-beingprofessional executiveexecutive directorfoundationsearly carecare education

2023

expandinggreater leadershipleadership exchangeexchange gplexgirlsfutureaddress racial

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $17k
$10k–50k7 grants · $231k
$50k–250k17 grants · $1.2M

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$50M

Total assets

Largest grants

PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN$175,000
PENNSYLVANIA VOICE$100,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$81,463
AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION$80,000
NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA$75,000
PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN$75,000
PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK$75,000
OSHUN FAMILY CENTER$70,000
SEAMAAC INC$65,000
CHILDREN FIRST$65,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY$50,000
NEW VOICES FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$50,000
EDUCATION LAW CENTER$50,000
ACCESS MATTERS$50,000
PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 8%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 98% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIPlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.3M · 38 repeat orgs$681k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.3M

$601k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%

+30%

Still filing today

63%

52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +37%
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
3× · 2020–2022 · $660k · revenue +16%
PH
PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK
7× · 2018–2024 · $599k · revenue +17%

Funded once

BS
BROAD STREET MINISITRY
one grant, 2020 · $150k
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
one grant, 2022 · $87k
CF
CHILDREN FIRST (FORMERLY PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH)
one grant, 2021 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Philadelphia University

To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.

Education

Philadelphia Chinatown Development

Pcdc provides bilingual, culturally sensitive assistance and services to clients in philadelphia's chinatown neighborhood

Community Improvement

Philadelphia Children's Alliance

Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…

Crime & Legal

Together for West Philadelphia

Together for West Philadelphia partners with healthcare systems community-based organizations, academic institutions, and public and private stakeholders to achieve equitable health outcomes for West Philadelphians.

Unclassified

Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.

Employment

The Philadelphia Center

Empower those living with hiv, eliminate new hiv transmissions, and enhance community wellness.

—

The Public Interest Law Center

The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…

Crime & Legal

Action Wellness

Provide broad range of services to people in philadelphia infected and affected by the hiv disease and other chronic illnesses.

Health

Philadelphia Visitor Center Corporation

Pvcc's mission is to enhance the experience to visitors to philadelphia by providing exceptional customer service and access to all that the city has to offer.

Community Improvement

Pennsylvania College of Health Sciences

The college's mission is to educate for excellence in healthcare practice, leadership, and the continuous acquisition of knowledge.

—

Greater Philadelphia Health Action Inc

FQHC offering Medical Dental Behavioral Child Development Services

—

Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art is committed to being the cultural heart of philadelphia. (sch o)pma is a national and international destination for art, but first and foremost we are philadelphia's museum for all the many diverse…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennsylvania Coalition for Oral Health and the most unlike its peers is University of Delaware. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

12%

1,853/14,845

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

37/37

Grantees still filing

31/37

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,547,057Human Services$1,488,702Crime & Legal$1,122,500Education$1,075,000Health$928,833Civil Rights$595,000Youth Development$263,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA50.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Independence Foundation · Claneil Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Scattergood Behavioral Health · Philanthropy Network Greater · Independence Public Media Of · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WEREIGN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +62% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814800671 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WEREIGN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 19% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Philadelphia Health Partnership?

Find your warmest path to Philadelphia Health Partnership through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Philadelphia Health Partnership?

More from the funding graph

PHILADELPHIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Philadelphia Health Partnership?

More from the funding graph