Skip to content
The Isabel Allende Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Isabel Allende Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$4.5MInternational$2.5MCrime & Legal$2.1MHuman Services$2.0MHealth$1.5MYouth Development$917kEducation$661kCommunity Improvement$270kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $543k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $310k
$20,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN$310,000
NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION$145,000
TOO YOUNG TO WED$130,000
THE BRIGID ALLIANCE$125,000
ADESO$125,000
THISTLE FARMS INC$110,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$100,000
REFUGE POINT$100,000
IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE$65,000
EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT$65,000
FLORENCE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT$60,000
YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$60,000
ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMERICAN WEST$60,000
KIND$60,000
MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS$55,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $60k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $15k → 8%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $8k → 8%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $8k → 8%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $45k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $5k → 8%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $35k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $25k → 14%FAIRFAX SAN ANSELMO CHILDREN'S CENTER: $21k → 8%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $5k → 17%FAIRFAX SAN ANSELMO CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 8%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $5k → 17%FAIRFAX SAN ANSELMO CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 8%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $125k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $15k → 17%FAIRFAX SAN ANSELMO CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8k → 8%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $15k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $13k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $8k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $25k → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $25k → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $23k → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $20k → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $20k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $16k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $15k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $15k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $15k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $15k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $15k → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $15k → 8%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $8k → 8%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $61k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $57k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $57k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $57k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $56k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $55k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $55k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $55k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $6k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $6k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of The Isabel Allende Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 48% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 34%.

The Isabel Allende Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 106 repeat orgs$642k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

106 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
62

Total granted

$14M
$454k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+10%

Still filing today

64%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $188k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +74%
  • TF
    THISTLE FARMS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $939k · revenue +186%
  • NY
    NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $877k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • S
    SISTERREACHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +71%
  • AD
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SW
    SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pangea Legal Services

Pangea's mission is to provide deportation defense services, advocate for policy change, and provide education and legal empowerment for our immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
2
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
3
The Advocates for Human Rights

To promote and protect human rights in the United States and around the world.

International
4
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
5
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
6
Center for Immigrant Protection

The LGBTAP is the only San Francisco nonprofit organization exclusively dedicated to providing accessible legal representation for LGBT asylum seekers who are fleeing persecution due to their sexual orientation, gener identity and/or HIV…

Crime & Legal
7
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
8
The Conversationalist
—
9
Center for Intimacy Justice

Center for Intimacy Justice (CIJ) works to create equity and wellbeing in people's intimate lives. CIJ's first program is changing Big Tech platforms discriminatory suppression of womens sexual and reproductive health information online.

Civil Rights
10
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
11
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
12
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Khaled Hosseini Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/103
Grantees still filing
72/103
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $1,981,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INCNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $876,650 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATIONREFUGEPOINT INC: $608,000 · InternationalREFUGEPOINT INCHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $235,900 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC+9 more: $419,800 · International+9 moreTHISTLE FARMS INC: $939,100 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INCNARAL PRO-CHOICE CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $180,000 · OtherCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $170,000 · OtherEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $530,900 · OtherEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT+111 more: $3,133,921 · Other+111 moreIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $345,000 · Crime & LegalIMMIGRANT …KIND INC: $336,000 · Crime & LegalKIND INCFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $255,000 · Crime & LegalFLORENCE I…THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER: $150,000 · Crime & LegalTHE HUMAN …MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $130,000 · Crime & LegalMOTIVATING…CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $90,000 · Crime & LegalCENTRO LEG…+4 more: $89,500 · Crime & Legal+4 moreMujeres Unidas y Activas: $450,500 · Human ServicesMujeres U…THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $265,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG…THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGI…HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $137,500 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBER…Center for Domestic Peace: $98,500 · Human ServicesCenter fo…Fairfax-San Anselmo Childrens Center: $51,750 · Human Services+10 more: $102,275 · Human Services+10 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $465,250 · HealthPLANNED P…Homeless Prenatal Program Inc: $440,000 · HealthHomeless …MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $95,000 · HealthMEDICAL S…CALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $70,000 · HealthCALIFORNI…+10 more: $112,500 · Health+10 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $667,175 · Civil RightsMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $140,000 · Civil RightsIFWHENHOW: $100,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $27,500 · Civil RightsToo Young to Wed Inc: $649,427 · Arts & CultureVENEZUELAN AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS INC: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $24,000 · Arts & Culture
International$4,121,350Other$4,953,921Crime & Legal$1,395,500Human Services$1,280,525Health$1,182,750Civil Rights$934,675Arts & Culture$733,427

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $1,981,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $939,100 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $876,650 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $667,175 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc: $649,427 over 8y, 15% of budgetREFUGEPOINT INC: $608,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $530,900 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $465,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMujeres Unidas y Activas: $450,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $440,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $345,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetKIND INC: $336,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $265,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $255,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $235,900 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $175,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCatholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc: $170,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER: $150,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $140,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $137,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER: $135,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $130,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLA COCINA: $115,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc: $115,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetRIPPLE EFFECT IMAGES: $110,000 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetSCHOLARMATCH INC: $109,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSISTERREACH: $100,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetIFWHENHOW: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Domestic Peace: $98,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $95,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetNorth Marin Community Services: $95,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $90,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWomens Recovery ServicesA Unique Place: $80,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetDaraja Education Fund: $80,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $70,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budget10000 DEGREES: $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIPAS: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVENEZUELAN AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetASYLUM ACCESS: $55,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFairfax-San Anselmo Childrens Center: $51,750 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetProspera Community Development: $51,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMADRE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN'S CENTERS: $50,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION MARIN: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN AGAINST RAPE: $40,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBUCKELEW PROGRAMS: $35,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Too Young to Wed Inc ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mujeres Unidas y Activas ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds KIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER ↗
  • Who funds MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds LA COCINA ↗
  • Who funds Global Response Management Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIPPLE EFFECT IMAGES ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARMATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERREACH ↗
  • Who funds IFWHENHOW ↗
  • Who funds Center for Domestic Peace ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds North Marin Community Services ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Marin Community Found…Tides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Jewish Community Fede…McNabb FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…ImpactassetsincBothin FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…The David and Lucile …Leonard & Beryl Buck …
The San Francisco FoundationCA40.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · McNabb Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Bothin Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Isabel Allende Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Isabel Allende Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 179 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Isabel Allende’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home