Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$465k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$1.1MEducation$526kHuman Services$470kArts & Culture$185kHealth$120kCivil Rights$103kYouth Development$100kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
MCGILL UNIVERSITY$65,424
HOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$25,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
FRIENDS OF IDF$25,000
CEDARS SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE$25,000
THINK AGAIN FOUNDATION$25,000
THE BIRTHRIGHT FOUNDATION$25,000
STAND WITH US$20,000
ALLIANCE COLLEGE -READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
SCARRITT FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SCARRITT FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 10%OHANA ONE: $5k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $100k → 17%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $75k → 14%NATIONAL CASA GAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%GLOBAL REACH: $50k → 7%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 10%OHANA ONE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $60k → 17%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%THINK AGAIN FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $10k → 17%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%MELANOMA RESEARCH SOCIETY: $3k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%THINK AGAIN FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%CASA OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%CASA OF LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $25k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $25k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $10k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $8k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $5k → 14%SAVE A HEART FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $5k → 14%SAVE A HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CEDARS SINAI WOMAN'S GUILD: $25k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $100k → 14%FRIENDS OF IDF: $50k → 14%FRIENDS OF IDF: $50k → 14%CEDARS SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE: $25k → 14%FRIENDS OF IDF: $25k → 14%CEDARS SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE: $25k → 14%STAND WITH US: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 26%.

The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 18 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$2.7M
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-3%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $550k · revenue +2%
  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $200k · revenue +32%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA
    4× · 2019–2024 · $185k · revenue +464%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
  • CS
    CEDARS SINAI WOMAN'S GUILD
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
3
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
4
Israeli-American Council

The organization's mission is to build an engaged and united israeli-american community that strengthens the israeli and jewish identity of our next generation, the american-jewish community and the bond between the peoples of the united…

Human Services
5
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
Physicians for Palestine
Health
8
Int'l Center for Conciliation Inc

The international center for conciliation fosters dignity and cooperation in conflict ridden communities through reconciliation and community preparedness.

International
9
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc

The mission of asian americans advancing justice-aajc (aajc) is to advance civil and human rights for asian americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all.

Civil Rights
10
Eradicate Hate Global Summit

The global summit is forging solutions to prevent all forms of hate-fueled violence.

Public Benefit
11
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

Religion
12
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

Aipac is an american grassroots organization that works to strengthen the u.s.-israel partnership. our mission is to encourage and persuade the u.s. government to enact specific policies that create a strong, enduring, and mutually…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Physicians for Human Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bicycle Angels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCGILL UNIVERSITY: $371,527 · OtherMCGILL UNIVERSITYTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $240,000 · OtherTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENTFRIENDS OF IDF: $125,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF IDFJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $100,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELESAMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherAMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATIONTHE BIRTHRIGHT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHINK AGAIN FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCEDARS SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+7 more: $82,500 · Other+7 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION F…PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $170,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS…+1 more: $20,000 · InternationalHOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC: $430,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE OUTREACH CE…BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $185,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIE…+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $75,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $18,000 · Civil RightsNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association: $10,000 · Civil RightsPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,194,027International$740,000Philanthropy$447,500Arts & Culture$247,000Education$230,000Civil Rights$103,000Youth Development$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC: $430,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $240,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $185,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $170,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE A HEART FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCARRITT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds BICYCLE ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association ↗
  • Who funds SCARRITT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Project Miracle ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Irv and Helga Cooper’s filings →

    More from the funding graph