Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$445k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

International$1.1MEducation$526kHuman Services$470kArts & Culture$185kHealth$120kCivil Rights$103kYouth Development$100kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
MCGILL UNIVERSITY$75,000
FRIENDS OF IDF$50,000
HOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC$50,000
RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT$40,000
LOS ANGELES MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST$25,000
THE BIRTHRIGHT FOUNDATION$25,000
CEDARS SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE$25,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$15,000
ALLIANCE COLLEGE -READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
BICYCLE ANGELS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 10%OHANA ONE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $100k → 17%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $75k → 14%NATIONAL CASA GAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 10%THINK AGAIN FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $60k → 17%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%CASA OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $10k → 17%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%MELANOMA RESEARCH SOCIETY: $3k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%CASA OF LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $25k → 14%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $10k → 14%RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT: $40k → 12%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $8k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $5k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%SAVE A HEART FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%BICYCLE ANGELS INC: $5k → 14%SAVE A HEART FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CEDARS SINAI WOMAN'S GUILD: $25k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $100k → 14%FRIENDS OF IDF: $50k → 14%FRIENDS OF IDF: $50k → 14%CEDARS SINAI EMERGENCY MEDICINE: $25k → 14%MIRACLE PROJECT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 26% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$2.3M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+105%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $200k · revenue +32%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA
    4× · 2019–2024 · $185k · revenue +464%
  • PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
  • TA
    THINK AGAIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
9
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
10
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
11
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
12
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Physicians for Human Rights Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bicycle Angels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MCGILL UNIVERSITY — $306,103 · OtherMCGILL UNIVERSITYTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT — $240,000 · OtherTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEM…FRIENDS OF IDF — $100,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF IDFJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $100,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELESAMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherAMERICAN ISRAEL FOUNDATION+6 more — $107,500 · Other+6 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION F…PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $170,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS…HOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC — $370,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE OUTREACH CE…BICYCLE ANGELS INC — $17,500 · PhilanthropyHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $185,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIE…+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · EducationCHAPMAN U…ALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationALLIANCE …PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $50,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $18,000 · Civil RightsNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association — $10,000 · Civil RightsSAVE A HEART FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $15,000 · Health
Other$928,603International$620,000Philanthropy$387,500Arts & Culture$222,000Education$220,000Youth Development$100,000Civil Rights$78,000Health$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE OUTREACH CENTER INC — $370,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetTHE RICHARDSON CENTER FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT — $240,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $185,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $170,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL — $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE A HEART FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetALLIANCE COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $18,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Irv and Helga Cooper Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph