· Private foundation
The International Humanitarian Fund in Honor of Mihajlo Labalo and Jean Sauer
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| IDAHO FOOD BANK | $4,000 |
| FRIENDS OF IDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISION INC | $4,000 |
| NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| TROUT UNLIMITED INC | $2,500 |
| IDAHO 2FLY INC | $2,000 |
| IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC | $2,000 |
| WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY | $1,000 |
| HOLY APOSTLES CATHOLIC CHURCH | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 8% of The International Humanitarian Fund in Honor of Mihajlo Labalo and Jean Sauer’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PCPACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION4× · 2017–2020 · $81k · revenue +63%
- TMTHE MAVEN PROJECT4× · 2018–2023 · $40k · revenue +140%
- HFHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC7× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- T5TEAM 5 MEDICAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $28k
- PCPLACERVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE LIVING MOUNTSIDE CSLone grant, 2024 · $6k
- RCROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BOISEone grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.
The mission of the teton regional land trust is to conserve working farms and ranches, fish and wildlife habitat, and scenic open spaces in eastern idaho for this and future generations.
To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…
The wood river land trust's mission is to protect and sustain the treasured landscapes and life-giving waters of the wood river valley and to inspire love for this special place for generations to come.
River and watershed restoration
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…
To conserve, protect and restore montana's coldwater fisheries and watersheds.
Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…
This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…
Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.
Working for a wild yaak through science, education, and bold action.
How this is measured
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAVEN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds TEAM 5 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Working Dogs For Conservation Found ↗
- Who funds Friends of Idaho Public Television Inc ↗
- Who funds LAND TRUST OF THE TREASURE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds SANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds IDAHO 2 FLY INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The International Humanitarian Fund in Honor of Mihajlo Labalo and Jean Sauer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The International Humanitarian Fund in Honor of Mihajlo Labalo and Jean Sauer. Bigger dots raise more.
- Santiam Memorial Hospital: 1% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy: 0% of income from government
- Seeding Justice: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The International Humanitarian Fund in Honor of Mihajlo Labalo and Jean Sauer?
Find your warmest path to The International Humanitarian Fund in Honor of Mihajlo Labalo and Jean Sauer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.