Skip to content
The Institute for Technology in Health Care at a glance

· Private foundation

The Institute for Technology in Health Care

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MHealth$1.0MInternational$624kFood & Nutrition$356kCommunity Improvement$80k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $380k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$49,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$1,000,000
HOPE FOR HAITI INC$172,406
ESCUELA AGRICOLA PAN-AMERICANA INC (ZAMORANO UNIVERSITY)$108,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE$100,000
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA CONWAY SCHOOL OF NURSING$49,500
WEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC$30,600
FRIENDS OF BARNABAS FOUNDATION$22,220
ST JEANNE DE LESTONNAC FREE CLINIC$15,000
GIVING HEALTH INC$15,000
LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MAGIC TOOTH BUS: $50k → 10%CROSSROADS4HOPE: $15k → 5%KINGDOM GLOBAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $80k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
NJ
CA
KY
WV
VA
MD
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 10 repeat orgs$481k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$3.8M
$421k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+23%

Still filing today

70%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +16%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $345k · revenue +23%
  • CF
    CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $231k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • SB
    ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue +23%
  • KG
    Kingdom Global Community Development Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue +348%
  • IE
    IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Administrators in Medicine Foundation
Health
2
Global Health Teams

Medical care and healthcare related support and education to under served or marginalized people throughout the world.

Unclassified
3
Healthcare in Haiti Inc

Sharing the hope of christ through compassionate healthcare. we support the operation of a medical and dental clinic in cap haitien, haiti, that has been in operation since 1963, started by us missionaries. our support includes funding for…

International
4
International Health & Development Network Inc

To develope a ministry using the earthly work of Jesus Christ as a model and thereby seek the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being of individuals in communities, esecially in developing countries by providing humanitarian…

Philanthropy
5
HDIInc

HDI`s mission is to advance world public health and human dignity, especially the health and socioeconomic situation of under-served populations which more others are significantly constrained by preventable, degrading disease.

International
6
Haiti Health Ministries

To provide health care and the gospel message to the impoverished in haiti

Health
7
Innovating Health International Inc

Innovating health international (ihi) is a non-profit dedicated to treating chronic diseases and addressing women's health issues in haiti and malawi. what we do- working with local partners, we aim to increase access to treatment and…

—
8
Health for Humanity

Improving health care services by building health care capacity in lesser developed and underserved areas of world and U.S.

International
9
OneWorld Health

To provide quality, affordable healthcare to people in need.

International
10
Heal International Medical Mission

Heal international medical mission (himm) provides medical services and spiritual encouragement to people in need in areas of need.

International
11
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
12
Good Samaritan Health Center of Cobb Inc

The organization's mission is to spread the love of christ by providing quality healthcare to those in need.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Virginia Oral Health Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2,115,000 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICAESCUELA AGRICOLA PAN-AMERICANA INC (ZAMORANO UNIVERSITY): $410,000 · OtherESCUELA AGRICOLA PAN-AMERICANA IN…THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE INC: $345,304 · OtherTHE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDIC…THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA CONWAY SCHOOL OF NURSING: $247,360 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERIC…ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $105,040 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $100,600 · OtherMary's Center for Maternal and Ch…+5 more: $94,000 · Other+5 moreHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $299,891 · InternationalHOPE FOR HAITI I…CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $231,154 · InternationalCRUDEM FOUNDATIO…Friends of Barnabas Foundation Inc: $46,820 · InternationalFriends of Barna…BUT GOD MINISTRIES: $25,786 · International+2 more: $20,020 · InternationalMEDICAL SOCIETY AND ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · HealthIDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC: $30,600 · HealthPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $22,330 · HealthGiving Health Inc: $15,000 · HealthKingdom Global Community Development Corporation: $80,000 · Human ServicesMAGIC TOOTH BUS: $50,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS4HOPE: $15,000 · Human Services
Education$2,115,000Other$1,302,304International$623,671Health$192,930Human Services$145,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2,115,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE INC: $345,304 over 7y, 12% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $299,891 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $231,154 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $105,040 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $100,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKingdom Global Community Development Corporation: $80,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMEDICAL SOCIETY AND ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 66% of budgetIDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMAGIC TOOTH BUS: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetFriends of Barnabas Foundation Inc: $46,820 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC: $30,600 over 1y, 16% of budgetBUT GOD MINISTRIES: $25,786 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $22,330 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS UP FOR HAITI INC: $15,520 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCROSSROADS4HOPE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLESTONNAC FREE CLINIC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGiving Health Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN: $9,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSERVANT HARTS: $4,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Institute for Technology in Health Care funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Institute for Technology in Health Care. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • CROSSROADS4HOPE: 1% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Institute for Technology in Health Care?

Find your warmest path to The Institute for Technology in Health Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Institute for Technology in Health Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home