· Private foundation
The Institute for Technology in Health Care
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $132k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $380k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA | $1,000,000 |
| HOPE FOR HAITI INC | $172,406 |
| ESCUELA AGRICOLA PAN-AMERICANA INC (ZAMORANO UNIVERSITY) | $108,000 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE | $100,000 |
| THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA CONWAY SCHOOL OF NURSING | $49,500 |
| WEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC | $30,600 |
| FRIENDS OF BARNABAS FOUNDATION | $22,220 |
| ST JEANNE DE LESTONNAC FREE CLINIC | $15,000 |
| GIVING HEALTH INC | $15,000 |
| LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA3× · 2022–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +16%
- TATHE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $345k · revenue +23%
- CFCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC5× · 2017–2023 · $231k · revenue +136%
Funded once
- SBST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue +23%
- KGKingdom Global Community Development Corporationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue +348%
- MTMAGIC TOOTH BUSone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -44% · 30% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Medical care and healthcare related support and education to under served or marginalized people throughout the world.
Sharing the hope of christ through compassionate healthcare. we support the operation of a medical and dental clinic in cap haitien, haiti, that has been in operation since 1963, started by us missionaries. our support includes funding for…
To develope a ministry using the earthly work of Jesus Christ as a model and thereby seek the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being of individuals in communities, esecially in developing countries by providing humanitarian…
HDI`s mission is to advance world public health and human dignity, especially the health and socioeconomic situation of under-served populations which more others are significantly constrained by preventable, degrading disease.
To provide health care and the gospel message to the impoverished in haiti
Innovating health international (ihi) is a non-profit dedicated to treating chronic diseases and addressing women's health issues in haiti and malawi. what we do- working with local partners, we aim to increase access to treatment and…
Improving health care services by building health care capacity in lesser developed and underserved areas of world and U.S.
To provide quality, affordable healthcare to people in need.
Heal international medical mission (himm) provides medical services and spiritual encouragement to people in need in areas of need.
Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…
The organization's mission is to spread the love of christ by providing quality healthcare to those in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is West Virginia Oral Health Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds Kingdom Global Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL SOCIETY AND ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC TOOTH BUS ↗
- Who funds IDSA EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Barnabas Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA ORAL HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds BUT GOD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
- Who funds HANDS UP FOR HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS4HOPE ↗
- Who funds LESTONNAC FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Giving Health Inc ↗
- Who funds LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SERVANT HARTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Institute for Technology in Health Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- CROSSROADS4HOPE — 1% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Institute for Technology in Health Care?
Find your warmest path to The Institute for Technology in Health Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.