Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Private foundation

The Institute for Technology in Health Care

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2024
13
Organizations funded FY2023
54%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$49,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,000,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 13
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$27M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 54% of the organizations The Institute for Technology in Health Care funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $259k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$1.5M30%
FY202313$1.5M54%
FY202211$582k55%
FY20216$273k33%
FY20203$103k33%
FY20193$73k0%
FY20184$123k25%
FY20174$154kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MHealth$1.0MInternational$624kFood & Nutrition$356kCommunity Improvement$80k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
NJ
CA
KY
WV
VA
MD
DC
MS
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 19 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($727k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Institute for Technology in Health Care supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 19 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Catholic University of America: $2,115,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Academy of HIV Medicine Inc: $345,304 over 7y, 12% of budgetHope for Haiti Inc: $299,891 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCrudem Foundation Inc: $231,154 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetSt Bonaventure University: $105,040 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $100,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKingdom Global Community Development Corporation: $80,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetIdsa Education and Research Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMagic Tooth Bus: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetFriends of Barnabas Foundation Inc: $46,820 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWest Virginia Oral Health Coalition Inc: $30,600 over 1y, 16% of budgetBut God Ministries: $25,786 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $22,330 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHands Up for Haiti Inc: $15,520 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCrossroads4hope: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLestonnac Free Clinic: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGiving Health Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLindquist Dental Clinic for Children: $9,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetServant Harts: $4,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Institute for Technology in Health Care with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Institute for Technology in Health Care?

Find your warmest path to The Institute for Technology in Health Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Institute for Technology in Health Care

How much does The Institute for Technology in Health Care give?
The Institute for Technology in Health Care reported 10 grants totaling $1,517,726 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Institute for Technology in Health Care fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (52%), Health (24%), International (14%).
Who are The Institute for Technology in Health Care's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: The Catholic University of America ($2.1M), The American Academy of HIV Medicine Inc ($345k), Hope for Haiti Inc ($300k).
Does The Institute for Technology in Health Care fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 54% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Institute for Technology in Health Care accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Institute for Technology in Health Care?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Endowment Foundation, Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is The Institute for Technology in Health Care based?
The Institute for Technology in Health Care is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Institute for Technology in Health Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph