Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Inglis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Religion$214kInternational$60kEducation$55kPhilanthropy$50kHuman Services$22k
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE$44,954
NATIONAL NETWORK OF YOUTH MINISTRIES$17,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
THORNSTON EDUCATION FUND$5,000
LEADING THE WAY$5,000
ATLANTA MISSION$1,000
GLOBAL SERVANTS$1,000
MUST MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ATLANTA MISSION: $5k → 8%ATLANTA MISSION: $1k → 8%ATLANTA MISSION: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$263k · 8 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$263k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+10158%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $60k · revenue +134%
  • MP
    Mt Paran Christian School Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +45%
  • AU
    ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • LT
    LEADING THE WAY-HELP THE PERSECUTED
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • SM
    SEWELL MILL BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue ×103

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Mission Global Usa

(1) To glorify God by making disciples everywhere by proclaiming and practicing the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit. (2) To engage in international world mission activities in order to take the Gospel of Jesus Christ…

Philanthropy
3
Servant Foundation

The Signatry advances the Christian faith by carrying out its mission, "to inspire and facilitate revolutionary biblical generosity across generations to solve the world's greatest problems," through financial and other support of I.R.C.…

Religion
4
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
5
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
6
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
7
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
8
Transform Ministries
9
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
10
World Servants Inc

The mission of world servants is to display gods love to the world through church partnerships and gospel-centered service. the vision of world servants is connect churches in the usa to churches around the world with a shared goal of…

Community Improvement
11
Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.

12
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL NETWORK OF YOUTH MINISTRIES — $65,000 · OtherNATIONAL NETWORK OF YOUTH MINISTRIESLEADING THE WAY-HELP THE PERSECUTED — $60,000 · OtherLEADING THE WAY-HELP THE PERSECUTEDLEADING THE WAY — $50,000 · OtherLEADING THE WAYTHORNSTON EDUCATION FUND — $25,000 · OtherTHORNSTON EDUCATION FUNDFAMILY MATTERS INC — $20,000 · OtherFAMILY MATTERS INCSEWELL MILL BAPTIST CHURCH — $15,792 · OtherSEWELL MILL BAPTIST CHURCH+4 more — $16,000 · Other+4 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $60,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more — $1,000 · ReligionDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $44,954 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED …NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRIS…Mt Paran Christian School Inc — $30,000 · EducationATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $7,000 · Human ServicesMust Ministries Inc — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$251,792Religion$61,000Philanthropy$49,954Education$30,000Human Services$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $44,954 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Paran Christian School Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL SERVANTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMust Ministries Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds Mt Paran Christian School Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TABLE ON DELK INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVANTS INC
  • Who funds Must Ministries Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Inglis Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Inglis Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Inglis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph