Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ina Kay Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2023
35
Grants FY2023
13
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MFood & Nutrition$542kArts & Culture$485kReligion$439kAnimals$373kHuman Services$334kYouth Development$272kCrime & Legal$240kOther$0
02FY2023 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $1,023,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,200,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $177,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $1.0M
$30,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Hospital Foundation$48,000
Blessings in a Backpack$44,000
Chesapeake Bay Foundation$42,000
Hazeldon Betty Ford Foundation$42,000
Days End Farm$40,000
Child Find of America$37,000
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Washington$37,000
Capital Area Food Bank$37,000
Canine Companions for Independence$37,000
Concerns of Police Survivors$32,000
American Friends of the Hebrew University$32,000
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation$32,000
American Friends of Israel Sports Disabled$32,000
St Margarets Parish (Charlies Place)$32,000
American Heart Association$32,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Canine Compoanions For Independence: $15k → 9%Wounder Warriors Project: $25k → 14%The Task Force for Global Health: $10k → 14%Canine Compoanions For Independence: $10k → 9%Wounder Warriors Project: $25k → 14%Jewish Council for the Aging: $25k → 8%Warrior Canine Connection: $15k → 8%Jewish Social Service Agency: $25k → 8%Jewish Council for the Aging: $10k → 8%Warrior Canine Connection: $10k → 8%Sugarloaf Citizens Association: $5k → 8%The Barker Foundation: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 74 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

74 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2023, 42 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
30

Total granted

$4.6M
$427k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+59%

Still filing today

65%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    3× · 2017–2022 · $235k · revenue +25%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $170k · revenue +53%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $147k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $48k · revenue -4%
  • WI
    WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +51%
  • AC
    American Cancer Society Northeast Region
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
8
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/71
Grantees still filing
57/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Black Rock Center for the Arts: $136,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of Greater Washington: $114,000 · OtherCANTER: $106,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of Israel Sports Disabled: $98,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $98,000 · OtherSt Margarets Parish (Charlies Place): $98,000 · OtherBig Brothers & Big Sisters: $98,000 · OtherANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $96,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC+56 more: $1,718,000 · Other+56 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $147,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITA…American Heart Association Inc: $128,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $106,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FO…American Diabetes Association: $81,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $58,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SO…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $49,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS …HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $48,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FOR…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $45,000 · Health+9 more: $182,000 · Health+9 moreCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $139,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COM…BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $129,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $44,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GL…JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COU…WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $25,000 · Human Services+3 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $235,000 · Arts & CultureLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $81,000 · Arts & CultureDANCE PLACE: $22,500 · Arts & CultureCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $144,000 · Food & NutritionFRESHFARM MARKETS: $97,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $25,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionCHILD FIND OF AMERICA INC: $134,000 · Crime & LegalCONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $98,000 · Crime & LegalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $98,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $40,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $35,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $30,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 · International
Other$2,732,000Health$844,500Human Services$472,000Arts & Culture$338,500Food & Nutrition$291,500Crime & Legal$232,000International$223,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $235,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $147,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $144,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $139,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD FIND OF AMERICA INC: $134,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $129,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $128,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $106,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $98,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC: $98,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $98,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRESHFARM MARKETS: $97,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $96,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCADCA: $85,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum: $81,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $81,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $81,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $58,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $49,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $44,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUSEA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetDAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFeeding America: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOODWORKS: $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCITY BLOSSOMS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDANCE PLACE: $22,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD FIND OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERNS OF POLICE SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESHFARM MARKETS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CADCA ↗
  • Who funds Lillian and Albert Small Capital Jewish Museum ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kay Family Foundation IncMD41.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kay Family Foundation Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Charles and Margaret Levin Family Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ina Kay Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ina Kay Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Humane Society of Marion County Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ina Kay Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Ina Kay Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.5M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ina Kay’s filings →

More from the funding graph