Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ilsababy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5.9MInternational$5.3MEnvironment$2.7MArts & Culture$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.0MEducation$1.9MHuman Services$1.1MScience & Tech$780kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$80,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
DIRECT RELIEF$500,000
HEATHER ABBOTT FDN$160,000
THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND$150,000
CLASSROOM CENTRAL$150,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$125,000
JOURNEY HOME$105,000
WINTER$100,000
NEADS$100,000
OPERATION HOME$90,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$90,000
NEABPD$80,000
KATIES KROPS$80,000
HARTFORD PROMISE$75,000
JEFFERSON BOARD FOR AGING$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEADS: $100k → 11%FRESH START WORK: $18k → 11%REESTABLISH RICHMOND: $30k → 22%NEADS: $100k → 11%NEADS: $90k → 11%APOPO: $70k → 14%NEADS: $90k → 11%APOPO: $70k → 14%NEADS: $80k → 11%APOPO: $60k → 14%NEADS: $65k → 11%OPERATION HOME: $90k → 12%APOPO: $50k → 14%NEADS: $45k → 11%OPERATION HOME: $85k → 12%OPERATION HOME: $75k → 12%JOURNEY HOME: $105k → 11%OPERATION HOME: $70k → 12%JOURNEY HOME: $100k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $95k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $85k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $80k → 11%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $40k → 10%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $35k → 10%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $30k → 10%JOURNEY HOME: $65k → 11%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $25k → 10%JOURNEY HOME: $60k → 11%PROJECT OUTPOUR: $15k → 10%JOURNEY HOME: $50k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $40k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 89 repeat orgs$917k to everyone else

89 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 66 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

89
15

Total granted

$23M
$844k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+114%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    7× · 2019–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +67%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2.2M · revenue +377%
  • CC
    CLASSROOM CENTRAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
2
Refugepoint Inc

Refugepoint partners with refugees to access life-changing solutions and transforms how the world supports them. refugepoint seeks to expand access to lasting solutions for refugees, especially those facing vulnerabilities who are…

International
3
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
4
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
5
Digital Harbor Foundation

Democratizing societal and economic well-being through digital equity for everyone, increased diversity in the tech sector, innovative education, and technology for the public good

Education
6
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
7
Harborquest Inc

To provide opportunity for a better life through appropriate employment for those disenfranchised from the mainstream economy.

Employment
8
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
9
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
10
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
11
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
12
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Her Justice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Culinary School of Charlotte Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $2,200,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATIONBRIDGE ARTS ENSEMBLE: $792,975 · OtherBRIDGE ARTS ENSEMBLEIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherHEATHER ABBOTT FOUNDATION: $510,000 · Other+83 more: $3,966,115 · Other+83 moreDIRECT RELIEF: $5,300,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFInsulin For Life USA Inc: $335,000 · InternationalInsulin For Life USA Inc+1 more: $70,000 · InternationalJOURNEY HOME INC: $680,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY H…NEADS INC: $570,000 · Human ServicesNEADS INCOPERATION HOME INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION…APOPO US INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesAPOPO US …PROJECT OUTPOUR: $145,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT O…+2 more: $48,000 · Human ServicesCLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $1,070,000 · EducationHARTFORD PROMISE INC: $270,000 · Education+1 more: $25,000 · EducationHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $535,000 · Recreation & SportsRIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC: $390,300 · Recreation & SportsHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $715,000 · Housing & ShelterUSS YORKTOWN FOUNDATION: $280,000 · Arts & CultureUGLY DUCKLING PRESSE LTD: $155,000 · Arts & CultureHUNGRY FOR MUSIC: $90,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$12,469,090International$5,705,000Human Services$2,013,000Education$1,365,000Recreation & Sports$925,300Housing & Shelter$715,000Arts & Culture$525,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,300,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $2,200,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetCLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $1,070,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $715,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $680,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetNEADS INC: $570,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $535,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHEATHER ABBOTT FOUNDATION: $510,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetKATIE'S KROPS: $395,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetRIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC: $390,300 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetInsulin For Life USA Inc: $335,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetOPERATION HOME INC: $320,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetUSS YORKTOWN FOUNDATION: $280,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetHARTFORD PROMISE INC: $270,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $260,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetAPOPO US INC: $250,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetUGLY DUCKLING PRESSE LTD: $155,000 over 8y, 9.0% of budgetPROJECT OUTPOUR: $145,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetRURAL RENEWABLE ENERGY ALLIANCE: $140,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetSAMARITANS INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHUNGRY FOR MUSIC: $90,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetEAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Culinary School of Charlotte Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetFORGE CITY WORKS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRE-ESTABLISH RICHMOND INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFresh Start Worx Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDARKNESS TO LIGHT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLUZERNE MUSIC CENTER INC: $7,446 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLASSROOM CENTRAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds NEADS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HEATHER ABBOTT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KATIE'S KROPS ↗
  • Who funds RIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds Insulin For Life USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds USS YORKTOWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds APOPO US INC ↗
  • Who funds UGLY DUCKLING PRESSE LTD ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT OUTPOUR ↗
  • Who funds RURAL RENEWABLE ENERGY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITANS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGRY FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Culinary School of Charlotte Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Nutmeg Foundation Inc · Travelers Foundation · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Carmax Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ilsababy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ilsababy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Journey Home Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Samaritans Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Riverfront Recapture Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Forge City Works Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ilsababy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ilsababy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ilsababy’s filings →

More from the funding graph