Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$21MEducation$7.4MArts & Culture$625kReligion$404kFood & Nutrition$335kAnimals$225kHuman Services$150kPublic Benefit$115kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $245k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
SJQ COL Wagner Scholarship Endowment$350,000
University of Utah$250,000
Hinckley Institute$35,000
SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW$30,000
Madeleine Choir School$25,000
Peel Therapeutics Inc$25,000
Snow College$25,000
SJ Quinney COL Scholarship Grant$25,000
University of Utah VSC$25,000
Carmel of the Immaculate Heart of Mary$20,000
Scenic Utah$15,000
Utah Film Center$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FLATHEAD VALLEY CCF: $25k → 11%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $5.0M → 8%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $50k → 9%SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%SJQ COL Wagner Scholarship Endowment: $350k → 8%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $330k → 8%University of Utah: $250k → 8%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $130k → 8%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $130k → 8%Utah Museum of Natrural History: $120k → 8%Utah Museum of Natural History: $120k → 8%Utah Museum of Natural History: $100k → 8%Univesity of Utah College of Law: $63k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HINKLEY INSITUTE OF POLITICS: $35k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HINKLEY INSITUTE OF POLITICS: $35k → 8%Hinckley Institute: $35k → 8%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $30k → 8%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $30k → 8%Uiversity of Utah Law School: $30k → 8%U of U Hinckley Institue: $30k → 8%HATCH FOUNDATION: $450k → 8%HATCH FOUNDATION: $350k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $20.0M → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $270k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $200k → 8%NHMU PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITS: $145k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $145k → 8%NHMU PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITS: $120k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $100k → 8%NHMU TEEN EXPLAINERS: $75k → 8%NHMU PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITS: $75k → 8%University of Utah Pioneer Theatre: $50k → 8%Maliheh Free Clinic: $100k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $135k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $85k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $60k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $30k → 8%Utah Film Center: $35k → 8%Wagner JCC: $1.0M → 8%WAGNER JCC CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $300k → 8%WAGNER JCC CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $100k → 8%USDB Education Foundation: $35k → 8%USDB EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%USDB EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28k → 8%Catholic Community Services of Utah: $50k → 8%Utah Tibetan Association: $100k → 8%CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE HEART: $230k → 8%CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE HEART: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 23 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 19 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$30M
$570k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+33%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25’26
EnvironmentEducationHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $335k · revenue +93%
  • SC
    SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +41%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UM
    Utah Museum of Natrural History
    one grant, 2018 · $120k
  • MF
    Maliheh Free Clinicgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +35%
  • UT
    UTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -45% · 100% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
3
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
5
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
6
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
7
Utah Taxpayers Association

The Utah Taxpayer's Association was founded as a nonprofit, nonpartisan voluntary organization of approxiamately 2,800 businesses, professionals and individuals who work together for more efficient and effective government. The…

Civil Rights
8
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
9
Utah State Fair Corporation

The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.

Recreation & Sports
10
Utah Arts Alliance

To foster the arts in all forms in order to create an aware, empowered, and connected community.

Arts & Culture
11
Utah Chamber Artists

The Utah Chamber Artists (UCA) is a world renowned, not-for-profit organization founded in 1991 to provide audiences with an artistic force that provides a wide variety of music of the highest caliber, presented in the finest manner. UCA…

Arts & Culture
12
Utah Energy Conservation Coalition Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Film Center; the most unlike its peers is Snow College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $20,935,000 · OtherUTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYSJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $5,650,000 · OtherSJQ COLLEGE OF LAW+35 more: $5,436,000 · Other+35 moreSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationMaliheh Free Clinic: $100,000 · HealthUTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $100,000 · AnimalsUTAH FILM CENTER: $70,000 · Arts & CultureIJ & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsScenic Utah: $15,000 · EnvironmentUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$32,021,000Education$150,000Health$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Animals$100,000Arts & Culture$70,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $335,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $100,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetUTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER: $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetIJ & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds UTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds IJ & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ij and Jeanne Wagner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph