Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$21MEducation$7.4MArts & Culture$625kReligion$404kFood & Nutrition$335kAnimals$225kHuman Services$150kPublic Benefit$115kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $250k+2 grants · $25M
$5,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$20,000,000
SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW$5,000,000
Utah Film Center$35,000
USDB Education Foundation$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FLATHEAD VALLEY CCF: $25k → 11%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $5.0M → 8%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $50k → 9%Snow College Foundation: $25k → 15%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $330k → 8%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $25k → 9%Snow College Foundation: $25k → 15%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $130k → 8%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $25k → 9%SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $130k → 8%SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%Utah Museum of Natural History: $120k → 8%Utah Museum of Natrural History: $120k → 8%Utah Museum of Natural History: $100k → 8%Univesity of Utah College of Law: $63k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HINKLEY INSITUTE OF POLITICS: $35k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HINKLEY INSITUTE OF POLITICS: $35k → 8%U of U Hinckley Institue: $30k → 8%SJQ COLLEGE OF LAW: $30k → 8%Uiversity of Utah Law School: $30k → 8%HATCH FOUNDATION: $450k → 8%HATCH FOUNDATION: $350k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $20.0M → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $270k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $200k → 8%NHMU PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITS: $145k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $145k → 8%NHMU PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITS: $120k → 8%UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $100k → 8%NHMU PROGRAMS AND EXHIBITS: $75k → 8%NHMU TEEN EXPLAINERS: $75k → 8%University of Utah Pioneer Theatre: $50k → 8%Maliheh Free Clinic: $100k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $135k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $85k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $60k → 8%Utah Food Bank: $30k → 8%Utah Film Center: $35k → 8%WAGNER JCC CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $300k → 8%WAGNER JCC CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $100k → 8%USDB EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%USDB Education Foundation: $35k → 8%USDB EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28k → 8%Catholic Community Services of Utah: $50k → 8%Utah Tibetan Association: $100k → 8%CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE HEART: $230k → 8%CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE HEART: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30M · 23 repeat orgs$570k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$30M
$570k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+33%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $335k · revenue +93%
  • SC
    SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +41%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UM
    Utah Museum of Natrural History
    one grant, 2018 · $120k
  • MF
    Maliheh Free Clinicgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +35%
  • UT
    UTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -45% · 100% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
2
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

3
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Utah State Fair Corporation

The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.

Recreation & Sports
5
Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

Community Improvement
6
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

7
Utah Medical Association

The Utah Medical Association is a professional resource for member physicians providing educational opportunities and dissemination of medical knowledge and practices.

8
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
9
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
10
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
11
Utah Sports Commission

The utah sports commission is governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports competitions to be held in the state…

Community Improvement
12
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Film Center and the most unlike its peers is Utah Tibetan Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $20,935,000 · OtherUTAH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYSJQ COLLEGE OF LAW — $5,620,000 · OtherSJQ COLLEGE OF LAW+26 more — $3,646,000 · Other+26 moreSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationMaliheh Free Clinic — $100,000 · HealthUTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $100,000 · AnimalsUTAH FILM CENTER — $60,000 · Arts & CultureIJ & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 · Environment
Other$30,201,000Education$150,000Health$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Animals$100,000Arts & Culture$60,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $335,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic — $100,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetUTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIJ & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK
  • Who funds SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic
  • Who funds UTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER
  • Who funds IJ & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ij and Jeanne Wagner Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph