Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ideker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$375k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$821kEducation$561kCommunity Improvement$505kReligion$355kRecreation & Sports$155kInternational$45kArts & Culture$30kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO$150,000
CROSSPURPOSE$100,000
DARE 2 SHARE MINISTRIES$50,000
ISSACHAR CENTER$30,000
ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE$25,000
ENDURANCE$10,000
ARMS OF LOVE INTERNATIONAL$5,000
BASKETBALL CLUB INTERNATIONAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $631k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESTON RANCH MINISTRIES: $1k → 9%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $175k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $150k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $125k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $90k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $50k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $40k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IA
CA
CO
MO
AZ
KS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of The Ideker Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 60%.

The Ideker Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 17 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$2.5M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+251%

Still filing today

65%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $820k · revenue +176%
  • AC
    ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $537k · revenue +17%
  • C
    CROSSPURPOSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $505k · revenue ×13

Funded once

  • HI
    HALFTIME INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -14%
  • EW
    ENDURANCE WITH JAN & DAVE DRAVECKY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • DS
    DENVER SEMINARY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Engage Hope Ministries

To glorify god by sharing the gospel and making disciples of jesus christ through partnerships with christian ministries in the countries we serve and through short-term mission trips that demonstrate the love of christ through…

International
3
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
4
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Turning Point for God

To broadcast the Gospel of Jesus Christ through the available means including television, radio, internet, recorded, and written formats.

Religion
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
In Christ Ministries Inc

In Christ Ministries exists to bring the message of Gods love grace and truth to children teens and adults. We do this through training and outreach events.

Religion
9
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
10
CrossTalk Global

CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…

Religion
11
Inspire Experiences Corporation

The Organization is a cooperative undertaking by churches with shared doctrinal beliefs to lead people to become fully devoted followers of Christ by inspiring Christ-centered Bible exploration and experiences.

Religion
12
Doug Holliday Ministries Inc

Doug Holliday Ministries exists to ignite the Body of Christ with Great Commandment-Great Commission priorities by inspiring, instructing, and involving the next generation of missional leaders worldwide. Programs include: Inspiring:…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dare 2 Share Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Bandimere Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $820,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $536,952 · ReligionALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGEIssachar Center: $115,000 · ReligionIssachar CenterTales from the Tour Inc: $42,000 · ReligionTales from the Tour IncEndurance with Jan & Dave Dravecky: $30,000 · Religion+2 more: $40,000 · ReligionCROSSPURPOSE: $505,000 · Community ImprovementCROSSPURPOSEDare 2 Share Ministries: $98,000 · OtherDare 2 Share …BASKETBALL CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $45,000 · OtherBASKETBALL CL…ARMS OF LOVE INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 · OtherARMS OF LOVE …ENDURANCE: $30,000 · OtherENDURANCEHALFTIME INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherHALFTIME INST…CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $20,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSAD…Open Up Inc dba Providence HomeShare dba Providence HomeShare: $15,000 · OtherBANDIMERE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherENDURANCE WITH JAN & DAVE DRAVECKY: $10,000 · OtherDENVER SEMINARY: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $109,900 · Youth DevelopmentWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC: $14,500 · Education
Human Services$821,000Religion$763,952Community Improvement$505,000Other$293,000Youth Development$109,900Education$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $820,000 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $536,952 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE: $505,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetIssachar Center: $115,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $109,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDare 2 Share Ministries: $98,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTales from the Tour Inc: $42,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetEndurance with Jan & Dave Dravecky: $30,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetBANDIMERE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetOpen Up Inc dba Providence HomeShare dba Providence HomeShare: $15,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetArms of Love International: $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC: $14,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPreston Ranch Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds Issachar Center ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Dare 2 Share Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Tales from the Tour Inc ↗
  • Who funds Endurance with Jan & Dave Dravecky ↗
  • Who funds BANDIMERE FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HALFTIME INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Open Up Inc dba Providence HomeShare dba Providence HomeShare ↗
  • Who funds Arms of Love International ↗
  • Who funds WHIZ KIDS TUTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds Preston Ranch Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Tyl Foundation · The New Horizons Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ideker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ideker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ideker Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ideker Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ideker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph