Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hurley-Trammell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of The Hurley-Trammell Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Foundation For The Carolinas, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Hurley-Trammell Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $83k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

19
’17
17
’18
13
’19
14
’20
13
’21
13
’22
13
’23
9
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MEducation$889kHealth$529kRecreation & Sports$417kHuman Services$152kArts & Culture$136kCommunity Improvement$76kAnimals$56kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $71k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATAWBA COLLEGE$15,000
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES$11,000
POPS AT THE POST$10,000
ROWAN LITTLE LEAGUE$10,000
ROWAN COUNTY UNITED WAY$10,000
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY$7,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HISTORIC SALISBURY FOUNDATION$1,000
FRIENDS OF ROWAN PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
FAMILY CRISIS COUNCIL$250
FAITHFUL FRIENDS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NAZARETH CHILD AND FAMILY CONNECTIO: $500 → 15%NAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $11k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $11k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $6k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $2k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $2k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 36 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
28

Total granted

$2.2M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+12%

Still filing today

58%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATAWBA COLLEGE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $513k · revenue +383%
  • RC
    ROWAN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +9%
  • RH
    ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • RS
    ROWAN-SALISBURY SCHOOL SYSTEM
    one grant, 2017 · $79k
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rowan County Chamber of Commerce

Promote the industrial, commercial, agricultural, economic, civic and social welfare of the people of salisbury and rowan county north carolina

Community Improvement
2
Rowan Economic Development Council

Promoting economic and industrial development in rowan county, north carolina

—
3
Salisbury-Rowan Community Action Agency

Salisbury-rowan community action agency is committed to providing education, child care, and other services to the underprivileged residents of salisbury, north carolina and two surrounding counties.

Human Services
4
Roxboro Community School Inc

Operation of a public charter school

Education
5
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
6
North Carolina Wesleyan University Inc

North carolina wesleyan university, a private institution affiliated with the united methodist church, prepares students for professional advancement, life-long learning, and responsible participation in their communities.

Education
7
Rockingham County Historical Society Museum and Archives

The preservation of the heritage and history of Rockingham County, North Carolina

—
8
Rowan County Youth Services Bureau Inc

Provide prevention & intervention services targeting at-risk youth in rowan county

—
9
River Mill Academy

Operation of a north carolina public charter school

Education
10
Russell Sage College

To cultivate, inspire, and transform our students in a nurturing, yet challenging, educational environment to become the managers and leaders organizations need right now.

Education
11
Roanoke College

Roanoke College develops students as whole persons and prepares them for responsible lives of learning, service, and leadership by promoting their intellectual, ethical, spiritual and personal growth.

Education
12
Roane State Community College Foundation

To maintain and enhance the quality of life, including economic development, in roane state's service area by developing friends and raising funds for the support of educational, cultural and service goals of roane state community college.…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of Rowan County; the most unlike its peers is Lee Street Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $1,218,754 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINASROWAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherROWAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONROWAN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $90,000 · OtherROWAN COUNTY UNITED WAY INCROWAN-SALISBURY SCHOOL SYSTEM: $79,000 · OtherROWAN-SALISBURY SCHOOL SYSTEMWINTHROP UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · OtherWINTHROP UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INC: $50,000 · Other+39 more: $274,200 · Other+39 moreCATAWBA COLLEGE: $513,273 · EducationCATAWBA COLLEGEHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $56,000 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CO…PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationPFEIFFER UNIVERSITYWinthrop University Foundation: $45,000 · EducationWinthrop University F…+7 more: $20,500 · EducationBELL TOWER GREEN INC: $400,394 · Arts & CultureBELL TOWER GREE…POPS AT THE POST INC: $74,000 · Arts & CulturePOPS AT THE POS…+5 more: $31,500 · Arts & Culture+5 moreROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $50,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSHELTER GUARDIANS INC: $45,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN COUNTY INC: $26,000 · Health
Philanthropy$1,218,754Other$1,128,200Education$679,773Arts & Culture$505,894Human Services$51,000Animals$45,000Health$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATAWBA COLLEGE: $513,273 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBELL TOWER GREEN INC: $400,394 over 2y, 79% of budgetROWAN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $90,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetPOPS AT THE POST INC: $74,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $56,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHELTER GUARDIANS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetPFEIFFER UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWinthrop University Foundation: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRUFTY-HOLMES SENIOR CENTER INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN COUNTY INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTERRIE HESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $12,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHISTORIC SALISBURY FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetROWAN MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSALISBURY SYMPHONY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLivingstone College: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ROWAN COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATERWORKS VISUAL ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROWAN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN PARTNERS FOR EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLEE STREET THEATRE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
  • Who funds CATAWBA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BELL TOWER GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROWAN COUNTY UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds POPS AT THE POST INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER GUARDIANS INC ↗
  • Who funds PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Winthrop University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RUFTY-HOLMES SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRIE HESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC SALISBURY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROWAN MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SALISBURY SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds Livingstone College ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOOD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ROWAN COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret C Woodson Foundation IncNC47.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret C Woodson Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Wilson L Smith Family Foundation the Smith Foundation · The Wallace Family Foundation Inc · Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc · Ketner Foundation Inc · Joe L & Hester Sims Family Foundation · The Bernheim Foundation Inc · The Goodman Foundation Inc · Brady Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hurley-Trammell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hurley-Trammell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hurley-Trammell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hurley-Trammell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hurley-Trammell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph