Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ketner Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$145kEducation$66kHealth$40kHuman Services$37kArts & Culture$31kPhilanthropy$30kRecreation & Sports$18kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$866k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATAWBA COLLEGE$15,000
COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN CO$5,000
PROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL$5,000
ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES$2,500
LUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINAS$2,500
LEE STREET THEATRE$1,500
ROWAN CABARRUS YMCA$1,500
NOVANT HEALTH ROWAN$1,000
N C TRANSPORTATION MUSEM$1,000
ROWAN ARTS COUNCIL$1,000
INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND OF NC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $3k → 15%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$347k · 21 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$347k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-18%

Still filing today

48%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATAWBA COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +159%
  • LC
    Livingstone College
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +87%
  • RA
    ROWAN ARTS COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • BT
    BELL TOWER GREEN INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -83%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN LEARNING
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • SC
    SALISBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rowan Economic Development Council

Promoting economic and industrial development in rowan county, north carolina

2
Rowan County Chamber of Commerce

Promote the industrial, commercial, agricultural, economic, civic and social welfare of the people of salisbury and rowan county north carolina

Community Improvement
3
Downtown Salisbury Inc

Promoting, enhancing and managing the development of the commercial, business, economic, residential, civic, and historical development of downtown salisbury, north carolina.

Community Improvement
4
Salisbury-Rowan Community Action Agency

Salisbury-rowan community action agency is committed to providing education, child care, and other services to the underprivileged residents of salisbury, north carolina and two surrounding counties.

Human Services
5
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
6
Carolina Civic Center

A theater for community theatrical groups, cultural, performance and other cultural or historical activities.

Community Improvement
7
Research Triangle Regional Partnership

The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…

8
Rowan Museum Inc

Collect, preserve, research, exhibit, and educate the public about the history of rowan county and piedmont north carolina through the use of its properties, programs and collections.

Arts & Culture
9
Caldwell Arts Council Inc

To promote the arts in caldwell county, nc

10
Carolina University

A christ-centered university committed to exceptional teaching, scholarly research, creative innovation, and professional collaboration.

Education
11
Greater Raleigh Chamber of Commerce

To build a thriving regional economy, enhance the community's quality of life, and strengthen member businesses.

12
The Carolinas Gateway Partnership Inc

The carolinas gateway partnership is dedicated to the creation of community wealth through the retention, creation, and expansion of business opportunities in tarboro, rocky mount, and edgecombe county, north carolina.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Carolinas and the most unlike its peers is Lee Street Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH — $103,000 · OtherST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCHLUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINAS — $41,250 · OtherLUTHERAN SERVICES CAROLINASNOVANT HEALTH ROWAN MEDICAL — $25,000 · OtherNOVANT HEALTH ROWAN MEDICALRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $20,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEINDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND — $16,500 · OtherINDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · Other+11 more — $27,550 · Other+11 moreCATAWBA COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationCATAWBA COLL…Livingstone College — $10,500 · EducationLivingstone …PROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC — $5,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE D…BELL TOWER GREEN INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureBELL TOWER …ROWAN ARTS COUNCIL INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureROWAN ARTS …NC TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Arts & CultureNC TRANSPOR…POPS AT THE POST INC — $5,000 · Arts & CulturePOPS AT THE…LEE STREET THEATRE — $3,000 · Arts & CultureLEE STREET …FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $30,000 · PhilanthropyROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES — $15,000 · Human ServicesROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN COUNTY INC — $10,000 · HealthTHREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC — $6,000 · Environment
Other$256,800Education$45,500Arts & Culture$41,000Philanthropy$30,000Human Services$16,500Health$10,000Environment$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATAWBA COLLEGE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELL TOWER GREEN INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLivingstone College — $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROWAN ARTS COUNCIL INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNC TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPOPS AT THE POST INC — $5,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEE STREET THEATRE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSALISBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOLE HOPE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATAWBA COLLEGE
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS
  • Who funds BELL TOWER GREEN INC
  • Who funds ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES
  • Who funds Livingstone College
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC OF ROWAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds ROWAN ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds NC TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds POPS AT THE POST INC
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds LEE STREET THEATRE
  • Who funds SALISBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
  • Who funds ROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SOLE HOPE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret C Woodson Foundation IncNC26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret C Woodson Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Hurley-Trammell Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Bernheim Foundation Inc · Brady Foundation · Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc · The Wallace Family Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ketner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph