Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
34
Grants FY2024
28
Organizations funded FY2023
7%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$500,000
Organizations funded a year
27 to 38
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$47M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 7% of the organizations The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving29$1.8M14%
FY202328$2.1M7%
FY202237$2.1M22%
FY202127$2.0M11%
FY202034$1.9M21%
FY201938$1.9M16%
FY201828$1.9M18%
FY201736$1.7Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$13MCrime & Legal$1.3MCivil Rights$495kPublic Benefit$455kReligion$280kSocial Science$180kHousing & Shelter$95kArts & Culture$82kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 49 grantees
All grantees of The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Azusa Pacific University$1,450,00080%
Simpson University$1,390,00071%
Pepperdine University$1,305,00060%
Westmont College$1,260,00051%
William Jessup University$710,00050%
California Lutheran University$500,00030%
The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies$485,00080%
University of San Diego$400,00070%
Pacific Legal Foundation$400,00070%
Pacific Research Institute For Public Policy$395,00081%
The Basic Fund$335,00081%
Christian Legal Aid of Los Angeles CO Gary Maeder$322,000834%
Thomas Aquinas College$310,00080%
Vanguard University of So Cal$310,00040%
Chapman University$250,00010%
Thriving Churches International Inc$250,000216%
Loyola Marymount University$250,00080%
Point Loma Nazarene University$210,00080%
Concordia University Irvine$200,00040%
San Diego Christian College$135,00040%
Life Pacific University$110,0002n/a
The Independent Institute$110,00051%
Los Angeles Mission Inc$95,00070%
Hope International University$91,00050%
Don Bosco Technical Institute$75,00070%
Criminal Justice Legal Foundation$70,00044%
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc$70,00050%
The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy$60,00050%
Biola University Inc$55,00040%
Pacific Union College$50,00050%
Fuller Theological Seminary$50,00010%
Western Christian Schools$47,50050%
The Blind Childrens Center Inc$44,00080%
Exceptional Children's Foundation$20,00040%
Boys and Girls Club of Vista Inc$20,00040%
Pacifica Christian High School$20,00020%
Wayfinder Family Services$16,00030%
West Coast Baptist College$15,0001n/a
Sound Body Sound Mind Foundation$15,000118%
Van Nuys High School$11,0001n/a
Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression Inc$10,00010%
Strive Foundation$5,00011%
Boys and Girls Club of Venice$5,00010%
The Legacy Funds of Holy Names University$5,00010%
Dream Center Foundation$5,00010%
Whittier Christian High School$5,00010%
Junipero Serra High School a Corp$4,7503n/a
Linden Oaks$1,00010%
Clairbourn School Inc$1,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($3.5M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 44 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAzusa Pacific University: $1,450,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSimpson University: $1,390,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPepperdine University: $1,305,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWestmont College: $1,260,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWilliam Jessup University: $710,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCalifornia Lutheran University: $500,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies: $485,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of San Diego: $400,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $400,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPacific Research Institute For Public Policy: $395,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetThe Basic Fund: $335,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetChristian Legal Aid of Los Angeles CO Gary Maeder: $322,000 over 8y, 34% of budgetThomas Aquinas College: $310,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVanguard University of So Cal: $310,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChapman University: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThriving Churches International Inc: $250,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetLoyola Marymount University: $250,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPoint Loma Nazarene University: $210,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetConcordia University Irvine: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSan Diego Christian College: $135,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Independent Institute: $110,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLos Angeles Mission Inc: $95,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHope International University: $91,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDon Bosco Technical Institute: $75,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCriminal Justice Legal Foundation: $70,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetManhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy: $60,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBiola University Inc: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Union College: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFuller Theological Seminary: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWestern Christian Schools: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $44,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetExceptional Children's Foundation: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Vista Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPacifica Christian High School: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSound Body Sound Mind Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetFoundation for Individual Rights and Expression Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStrive Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Venice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Legacy Funds of Holy Names University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDream Center Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhittier Christian High School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLinden Oaks: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 44.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Fletcher Jones Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Henry L Guenther Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation with peer funders

About The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation

How much does The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation give?
The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation reported 34 grants totaling $1,860,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 27 and 38 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (81%), Crime & Legal (8%), Civil Rights (3%).
Who are The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Azusa Pacific University ($1.4M), Simpson University ($1.4M), Pepperdine University ($1.3M).
Does The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, The Green Foundation, The Ahmanson Foundation.
Where is The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation based?
The Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hugh and Hazel Darling’s filings →

More from the funding graph