Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Howe Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$31kPhilanthropy$24kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$10kReligion$9kEducation$5kArts & Culture$4kSocial Science$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF MCDONOUGH COUNTY$5,000
COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
BROWARD HOUSING SOLUTIONS$3,000
WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IAVA: $1k → 17%LUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES: $500 → 14%IAVA: $1k → 17%SAMARITAN WELL: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$81k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$81k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • WI
    WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +32%
  • CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • MC
    MCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -64%
  • CM
    CONTEMPLATIVE MIND IN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Timothy Initiative Ministries Inc

We serve men whose lives have fallen apart due to addiction, homelessness, or some other major life challenge. We provide discipleship, recovery homes, sober living communities, and work therapy.

Human Services
2
Florida Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The Coalition is to eliminate homelessness by providing education on homelessness issues, advocating for issues that help homeless people, networking with advocates throughout Florida, and promoting involvement

—
3
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
4
Counseling for Community Wellness Inc

To provide affordable and high quality mental health counseling services to individuals and families in need.

—
5
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals
6
Florida Council Against Sexual Violence Inc

Sexual violence shatters lives, wounds communities and perpetuates injustice. the florida council against sexual violence leads, informs and inspires the people of florida to create safe and just communities.

Health
7
Recovery Connections of Central Florida

Through empathetic compassion, we ae committed to connecting individuals and families to resources that offer multiple pathways to long-term, sustainable recovery.

Human Services
8
Blue Waters Recovery Foundation

Providing a safe,structured recovery environment for persons suffering from alcohlism and drug addiction allowing for the application of the twelve steps to return persons to society usefully whole

Housing & Shelter
9
Lutheran Services Florida Inc

Lutheran services florida brings god's healing, hope, and help to people in need in the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
10
Second Chance Humane Society Inc

Improving the lives of animals by fostering the human-animal bond.

Animals
11
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
12
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan Well Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lambda South Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MDH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherMDH FOUNDATIONBROWARD HOUSING SOLUTIONS: $14,500 · OtherBROWARD HOUSING SOLUTIONSYMCA OF MCDONOUGH COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherYMCA OF MCDONOUGH COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCONTEMPLATIVE MIND IN SOCIETY: $4,000 · Other+8 more: $10,250 · Other+8 moreSECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropySECOND CHANCE S…MCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMCDONOUGH COUNT…TSR Adventures Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTSR Adventures …WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM: $3,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTHE SAMARITAN WELL INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES: $500 · Human ServicesTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$81,250Philanthropy$16,000Arts & Culture$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Human Services$5,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM: $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTSR Adventures Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA SOUTH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMARITAN WELL INC ↗
  • Who funds Salvations Dog and Cat Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TSR Adventures Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA SOUTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Howe Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Howe Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Howe’s filings →

More from the funding graph