Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Howe Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$31kPhilanthropy$24kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$10kReligion$9kEducation$5kArts & Culture$4kSocial Science$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF MCDONOUGH COUNTY$5,000
COMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
BROWARD HOUSING SOLUTIONS$3,000
WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%IAVA: $1k → 17%LUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES: $500 → 14%IAVA: $1k → 17%SAMARITAN WELL: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$81k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • WI
    WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +32%
  • CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • MC
    MCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -64%
  • CM
    CONTEMPLATIVE MIND IN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Timothy Initiative Ministries Inc

We serve men whose lives have fallen apart due to addiction, homelessness, or some other major life challenge. We provide discipleship, recovery homes, sober living communities, and work therapy.

Human Services
2
Florida Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The Coalition is to eliminate homelessness by providing education on homelessness issues, advocating for issues that help homeless people, networking with advocates throughout Florida, and promoting involvement

3
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
4
Counseling for Community Wellness Inc

To provide affordable and high quality mental health counseling services to individuals and families in need.

5
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals
6
Florida Council Against Sexual Violence Inc

Sexual violence shatters lives, wounds communities and perpetuates injustice. the florida council against sexual violence leads, informs and inspires the people of florida to create safe and just communities.

Health
7
Recovery Connections of Central Florida

Through empathetic compassion, we ae committed to connecting individuals and families to resources that offer multiple pathways to long-term, sustainable recovery.

Human Services
8
Blue Waters Recovery Foundation

Providing a safe,structured recovery environment for persons suffering from alcohlism and drug addiction allowing for the application of the twelve steps to return persons to society usefully whole

Housing & Shelter
9
Lutheran Services Florida Inc

Lutheran services florida brings god's healing, hope, and help to people in need in the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
10
Second Chance Humane Society Inc

Improving the lives of animals by fostering the human-animal bond.

Animals
11
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

12
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Samaritan Well Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lambda South Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MDH FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherMDH FOUNDATIONBROWARD HOUSING SOLUTIONS — $14,500 · OtherBROWARD HOUSING SOLUTIONSYMCA OF MCDONOUGH COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherYMCA OF MCDONOUGH COUNTYIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCONTEMPLATIVE MIND IN SOCIETY — $4,000 · Other+8 more — $10,250 · Other+8 moreSECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropySECOND CHANCE S…MCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyMCDONOUGH COUNT…TSR Adventures Inc — $1,000 · PhilanthropyTSR Adventures …WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM — $3,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION — $3,500 · Arts & CultureTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN — $5,000 · Crime & LegalTHE SAMARITAN WELL INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES — $500 · Human ServicesTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$81,250Philanthropy$16,000Arts & Culture$7,000Crime & Legal$5,000Human Services$5,000Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM — $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTSR Adventures Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA SOUTH INC — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds MCDONOUGH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN
  • Who funds WESTERN ILLINOIS MUSEUM
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION
  • Who funds THE SAMARITAN WELL INC
  • Who funds Salvations Dog and Cat Rescue Inc
  • Who funds IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds THE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TSR Adventures Inc
  • Who funds LUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES
  • Who funds LAMBDA SOUTH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Howe Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph