Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Howe Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$2.6MEducation$1.4MPhilanthropy$945kReligion$610kHuman Services$592kArts & Culture$241kCommunity Improvement$156kRecreation & Sports$135kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF MUSCATINE$1,008,975
WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$80,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$70,000
MUSCATINE CHARITIES INC$30,000
HOOVER PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY$30,000
UNITED WAY$30,000
FRIENDS OF MUSCATINE FFA$25,000
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO$25,000
AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOC$25,000
STEM MATTERS INC$15,000
IOWA STATE UNIV FOUNDATION$12,632
FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER$10,000
YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION$10,000
MUSCATINE FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE A$5,000
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $816k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE BABY FOLD: $38k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $38k → 11%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $501k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $90k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $55k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $50k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $11k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 12%FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $2k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $1k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $1k → 12%MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
SD
IA
CA
KY
VA
AZ
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 32 repeat orgs$542k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
19

Total granted

$6.0M
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-24%

Still filing today

47%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    King's Ridge Christian School
    2× · 2017–2018 · $350k · revenue +33%
  • RI
    ROCK IN PREVENTION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $340k · revenue +142%
  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $252k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • MB
    MUSCATINE - BEYOND 2000
    one grant, 2018 · $290k · revenue -99% · 43% of their budget
  • GI
    GREATSCHOOLS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -24%
  • IW
    Iowa Wesleyan University
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -150%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
2
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
3
Muscatine Safe Streets Inc

To deter and reduce crime, especially juvenile delinquency and gang activity, through organized neighborhoods by improving community living conditions and strengthening families.

—
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
6
Muscatine Christian Academy

Dedicated to developing students who desire to love god and others, and are academically prepared for gods unique plan for their lives.

Education
7
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
8
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
9
Morningside University

The morningside university experience cultivates a passion for life-long learning and a dedication to ethical leadership and civic responsibility.

Education
10
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
11
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
12
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine; the most unlike its peers is Muscatine - Beyond 2000. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF MUSCATINE: $1,890,821 · OtherCITY OF MUSCATINEWESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $491,520 · OtherWESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHROCK IN PREVENTION INC: $340,000 · OtherROCK IN PREVENTION INCMUSCATINE - BEYOND 2000: $290,000 · OtherMUSCATINE - BEYOND 2000HOOVER PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY: $152,000 · Other+41 more: $1,022,001 · Other+41 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $577,820 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUN…MUSCATINE CHARITIES INC: $322,486 · PhilanthropyMUSCATINE CHAR…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $516,500 · Human ServicesMUSCATINE CO…FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $224,692 · Human ServicesFLICKINGER L…THE BABY FOLD: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE BABY FOL…King's Ridge Christian School: $350,000 · EducationKing's Ridge…IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $252,095 · EducationIOWA STATE U…MUSCATINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $130,067 · EducationMUSCATINE CO…GREATSCHOOLS INC: $50,000 · EducationGREATSCHOOLS…+1 more: $25,000 · EducationJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $210,000 · Public BenefitMUSCATINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC: $109,199 · Arts & CultureYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,795 · Recreation & Sports
Other$4,186,342Philanthropy$910,306Human Services$816,192Education$807,162Public Benefit$210,000Arts & Culture$109,199Recreation & Sports$106,795

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $577,820 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y: $516,500 over 6y, 18% of budgetROCK IN PREVENTION INC: $340,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetMUSCATINE CHARITIES INC: $322,486 over 5y, 45% of budgetMUSCATINE - BEYOND 2000: $290,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $252,095 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER: $224,692 over 6y, 34% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $210,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $130,067 over 6y, 22% of budgetMUSCATINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC: $109,199 over 7y, 18% of budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION: $92,915 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $89,076 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE BABY FOLD: $75,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWoodford Humane Society Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetGREATSCHOOLS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIowa Wesleyan University: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Garden Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMUSCATINE SOCCER CLUB: $1,795 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN AVIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCATINE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y ↗
  • Who funds King's Ridge Christian School ↗
  • Who funds ROCK IN PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE - BEYOND 2000 ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BABY FOLD ↗
  • Who funds Woodford Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATSCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Wesleyan University ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

HNI Charitable FoundationIA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: HNI Charitable Foundation · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · New Hope Foundation · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · Jensen Private Foundation Inc · United Way of Muscatine Iowa · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Stanley Consultants Charitable Foundation · Holthues Trust · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Howe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Howe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Howe Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Howe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Howe’s filings →

More from the funding graph