Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Houser Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$97kHuman Services$18kHealth$16kPhilanthropy$8kEnvironment$8kCrime & Legal$6kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$495
Median grant
4
States reached
$221
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$12,302
OPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT$1,000
DALLAS SALVATION ARMY$518
COUSE SHARP HISTORICAL SITE$500
THE OSS SOCIETY INC$495
WOMEN'S COUNCIL OF THE DALLAS ARBORETUM$250
NETWORK FOR GOOD$250
EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS$190
DEC MY ROOM$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE FAMILY PLACE: $140 → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 → 14%BRING THE LIGHT MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
CO
VA
NM
TN
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$124k · 12 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
31

Total granted

$124k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-25%

Still filing today

42%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $675 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OE
    OPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +198%
  • TE
    THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +31%
  • TC
    THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $654 · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CR
    COMPASS ROSE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • EC
    ELLIS COUNTY DUCKS UNLIMITED
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • D
    DCAC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
2
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
3
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
4
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
7
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
10
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
11
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
12
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Zoies Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $86,439 · OtherSAINT MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCOMPASS ROSE SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherCOMPASS ROSE SOCIETYELLIS COUNTY DUCKS UNLIMITED: $5,800 · OtherDCAC: $5,000 · Other+32 more: $20,820 · Other+32 moreOPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC: $15,102 · HealthOPERATION ENDURING…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,600 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SO…NETWORK FOR GOOD: $7,515 · Public Safety & DisasterThe OSS Society Inc: $1,585 · Arts & CultureTHE COUSE FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CultureBRING THE LIGHT MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $140 · Human ServicesTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $654 · Philanthropy+1 more: $16 · PhilanthropyWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION: $187 · International
Other$128,059Health$26,702Public Safety & Disaster$7,515Arts & Culture$2,085Human Services$1,640Philanthropy$670International$187

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC: $15,102 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $7,515 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $2,120 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe OSS Society Inc: $1,585 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRING THE LIGHT MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUSE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOIES PLACE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION: $187 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDec My Room Inc: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place: $140 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $16 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds The OSS Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRING THE LIGHT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds Texas Women's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE COUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZOIES PLACE ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Dec My Room Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Houser Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Houser Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Houser’s filings →

    More from the funding graph