Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Horwitz Family Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$954k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$849kReligion$740kPhilanthropy$436kHealth$329kEmployment$260kHousing & Shelter$248kPublic Safety & Disaster$236kHuman Services$205kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $253k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $668k
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH SHOLOM$128,000
MONA FOUNDATION$110,000
HANAFESH$86,000
HELP$75,000
THE HAITIAN PROJECT$68,750
MOBILE GIVING FOUNDATION$50,000
CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFF$50,000
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY UWKC$50,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CEN$50,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
RABBI DISCRETIONARY FUND$25,000
YEAR UP KING COUNTRY$25,000
TREES' FOUNDATION$20,000
JOINT DEVELOPEMENT CORP$20,000
RON BROWN SCHOLARSHIP FUND$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER: $8k → 8%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $3k → 6%FURNITURE BANK: $15k → 16%MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER: $5k → 8%HOUSTON FURNITURE BANK: $15k → 16%HOUSTON FURNITURE BANK: $15k → 16%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER: $5k → 8%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER: $5k → 8%HOUSTON FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 16%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%HOUSTON FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 16%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 51 repeat orgs$412k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
40

Total granted

$3.8M
$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+25%

Still filing today

51%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MONA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +24%
  • TH
    THE HAITIAN PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $248k · revenue +41%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $226k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • T
    TBS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FUTURE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
2
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
3
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
4
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
5
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
12
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hadassah Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HANAFESH: $424,000 · OtherHANAFESHTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $238,200 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $225,500 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERHELP: $150,000 · OtherHELPJEWISH FEDERATION FAMILY SERVICE: $140,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION FAMILY SERVICEIndividual grant recipient: $135,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE BETH SHOLOM: $132,300 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHOLOMCOMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT C: $120,000 · Other+72 more: $826,984 · Other+72 moreUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $375,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KIN…MONA FOUNDATION: $260,000 · PhilanthropyMONA FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,865 · PhilanthropyTHE HAITIAN PROJECT INC: $247,750 · InternationalTHE HAITIAN PRO…HAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $240,000 · InternationalHAITIAN EDUCATI…WORLDREADERORG: $95,000 · InternationalWORLDREADERORG+2 more: $10,500 · InternationalYEAR UP INC: $260,000 · EducationCHALLENGE DAY FUND: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE FURNITURE BANK: $65,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $60,000 · Human ServicesTHE MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesEverstrong Prevention: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $110,000 · Public Safety & DisasterINTER-CANYON LEAGUE: $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $60,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · Health
Other$2,391,984Philanthropy$636,865International$593,250Education$272,000Human Services$160,000Public Safety & Disaster$116,000Health$64,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $375,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $260,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMONA FOUNDATION: $260,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTHE HAITIAN PROJECT INC: $247,750 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetHAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $240,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $225,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $110,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORLDREADERORG: $95,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FURNITURE BANK: $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $60,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCASCADIA WILDLANDS: $20,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $16,584 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHALLENGE DAY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKLAMATH FOREST ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBOULDERSHARES: $10,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetEverstrong Prevention: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTER-CANYON LEAGUE: $6,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE TLC FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $3,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeam Read: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBBB WISE GIVING ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $565 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds MONA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HAITIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT ↗
  • Who funds WORLDREADERORG ↗
  • Who funds THE FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL LISNOW RESPITE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASCADIA WILDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE ART MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · United Way Worldwide · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Horwitz Family Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Horwitz Family Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Horwitz Family Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph