Skip to content
The Horodas Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Horodas Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$199kScience & Tech$111kReligion$102kHuman Services$77kEducation$44kInternational$33kHealth$22kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
$5,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT LEGACY$16,667
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - UC DAVIS RESEARCH GRANT$15,900
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION - HELEN DILLER INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL$15,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION - HELEN DILLER INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL$15,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$11,250
CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION ON DEAFNESS$5,500
JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,500
OLGA LENGYEL INSTITTUE FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES$2,500
TEMPLE BETH ABRAHAM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT LEGACY: $17k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%CONCORD CHILD CARE CENTER: $2k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%PROJECT LEGACY: $17k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%PROJECT LEGACY: $17k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$565k · 16 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$565k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+49%

Still filing today

75%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsReligionInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +217%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $65k · revenue +48%
  • PL
    PROJECT LEGACY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • IU
    ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • UB
    UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • C
    CEID
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
5
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
6
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
9
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
10
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement
11
Int'l Center for Conciliation Inc

The international center for conciliation fosters dignity and cooperation in conflict ridden communities through reconciliation and community preparedness.

International
12
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - UC DAVIS RESEARCH GRANT: $111,300 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - UC …UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION - HELEN DILLER INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL: $95,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION - HELEN DILLER INSTITUTE F…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL: $10,500 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCEID: $10,000 · OtherISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $26,650 · Other+10 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $65,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LE…INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY: $20,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR THE …AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $18,850 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH CO…PROJECT LEGACY: $50,001 · Human ServicesPROJECT LEGAC…THE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE LJD JEWIS…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $70,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF JC…LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $6,000 · ReligionLEAGUE TO SAV…Center for Early Intervention on Deafness: $28,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationTHE OLGA LENGYEL INSTITUTE FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $32,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,500 · Health
Other$273,450Civil Rights$103,850Human Services$77,001Religion$76,000Education$42,000International$33,000Health$21,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $70,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LEGACY: $50,001 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Early Intervention on Deafness: $28,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $18,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OLGA LENGYEL INSTITUTE FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORD CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Literacy Coalition Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Horodas Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Horodas Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Horodas Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home