Skip to content

· Public charity

The Hope School

The hope learning academy serves children with intellectual/developmental disabilities and neurological disorders and their families by providing homes in which to grow, schools in which to learn, clinics in which to become healthier, research into emerging practices, and training for providers and parents.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$646k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$23M
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.7M
$242,111
Median grant
1
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERISTY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO$645,565
HOPE CLINICAL CARE$522,646
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$512,793
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$362,449
EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS$316,074
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN$295,249
EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$242,111
KREIDER SERVICES INC$241,733
TRINITY SERVICES INC$229,275
EASTERSEALS METROPOLITAN$222,840
RCADD$115,837
HAVE DREAMS$79,500
THE ANSWER INC$59,100
GRUPO SALTO$29,311
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LITTLE FRIENDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $83k → 7%TRINITY SERVICES INC: $277k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $67k → 7%TRINITY SERVICES INC: $237k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $61k → 7%TRINITY SERVICES INC: $237k → 7%TRINITY SERVICES INC: $229k → 7%TRINITY SERVICES INC: $226k → 7%TRINITY SERVICES INC: $216k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$23M
$0

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOPE CLINICAL CARE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +115%
  • EF
    EASTERSEALS FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +68% · 30% of their budget
  • TS
    TRINITY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +85%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Autism Services Inc

    To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

    —
    2
    Innovative Services Inc

    Innovative services, inc. (innovative care services) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities…

    Human Services
    3
    Little City Foundation

    To ensure that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are provided with the best options and opportunities to live safely, work productively, explore creatively, learn continuously and play pleasurably throughout their…

    Human Services
    4
    Individual Advocacy Group Inc

    Iag's mission is to aid & provide customized services to both children and adults with disabilities, and their families, to live normal lives in the community, to remain in a community home, live independently and actively participate in…

    Civil Rights
    5
    Rimland Services Nfp

    Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

    Human Services
    6
    Oak Leyden Developmental Services Inc

    To help people with developmental disabilities meet life's challenges and reach their highest potential.

    —
    7
    The Hope School

    The hope learning academy serves children with intellectual/developmental disabilities and neurological disorders and their families by providing homes in which to grow, schools in which to learn, clinics in which to become healthier,…

    Education
    8
    Dakotabilities Inc

    Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

    Human Services
    9
    Easter Seals Midwest

    To assist individuals with developmental disabilities, including autism, how to learn, live, work, and participate in the community.

    —
    10
    Easterseals Central Illinois

    Easterseals central illinois provides exceptional services to ensure children with developmental delays, disabilities and other special needs can reach their full potential.

    Health
    11
    Easter Seals of Joliet Region Inc

    The mission of easter seals is to increase independence, maximize opportunities, minimize barriers, and enhance the quality of life for children and adults with disabilities, those with special needs and thier families through direct…

    Human Services
    12
    Cole County Residential Services Inc

    Provide services for individuals with developmental disabilities

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Inc; the most unlike its peers is Answer Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    9/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $6,205,451 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,751,604 · OtherBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALE: $1,868,334 · OtherSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALEKREIDER SERVICES INC: $1,387,468 · OtherKREIDER SERVICES INCEastern Illinois Universit: $667,784 · Other+1 more: $67,093 · OtherHOPE CLINICAL CARE: $3,570,375 · HealthHOPE CLINICAL CAREEASTER SEALS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $1,293,283 · HealthEASTER SEALS METROPOLITA…EASTERSEALS FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $1,963,405 · PhilanthropyEASTERSEA…TRINITY SERVICES INC: $1,423,124 · Human ServicesLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $211,431 · Human ServicesCTF ILLINOIS: $522,675 · Housing & ShelterHAVE DREAMS: $436,374 · EmploymentANSWER INC: $335,270 · Youth Development
    Other$12,947,734Health$4,863,658Philanthropy$1,963,405Human Services$1,634,555Housing & Shelter$522,675Employment$436,374Youth Development$335,270

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE CLINICAL CARE: $3,570,375 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetEASTERSEALS FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $1,963,405 over 7y, 30% of budgetTRINITY SERVICES INC: $1,423,124 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKREIDER SERVICES INC: $1,387,468 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $1,293,283 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCTF ILLINOIS: $522,675 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHAVE DREAMS: $436,374 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetANSWER INC: $335,270 over 7y, 16% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $211,431 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HOPE CLINICAL CARE ↗
    • Who funds EASTERSEALS FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
    • Who funds TRINITY SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds KREIDER SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds EASTER SEALS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
    • Who funds CTF ILLINOIS ↗
    • Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
    • Who funds ANSWER INC ↗
    • Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Coleman Foundation IncIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Coleman Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Hope School funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hope School. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Hope School’s filings →

      More from the funding graph