Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hohmann Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.9M
Granted FY2019
27
Grants FY2019
11
States reached
$3.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$3.7MArts & Culture$171kEducation$111kReligion$94kScience & Tech$41kHealth$11kInternational$10kSocial Science$10kOther$0
02FY2019 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k20 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.7M
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FRANK HOHMANN FOUNDATION$3,721,830
WINTERTHUR MUSEUM$27,000
MADISON AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$22,000
MT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB$15,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$15,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSIUM OF ART$13,000
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$12,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITIES & SCHOOLS$5,000
FRIENDS OF MUSIQUE VINAU CLOS VOUGEOT INC$5,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$3,500
THE MAYO CLINIC$2,500
WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY$2,500
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATCH AND CLOCK COLLECTORS$1,000
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%AVAIL NYC: $1k → 17%AVAIL NYC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
VA
DE
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$432k · 23 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2019, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$432k
$11k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $80k · revenue +5%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2017–2019 · $49k · revenue +58%
  • TR
    THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • TI
    THRONWILLOW INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
7
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
10
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Deerfield Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FRANK HOHMANN FOUNDATION: $3,721,830 · OtherTHE FRANK HOHMANN FOUNDATION+19 more: $287,210 · Other+19 moreThe Trustees of Princeton University: $80,300 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $15,500 · EducationYale University: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $1,900 · EducationMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $48,500 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATCH AND CLOCK COLLECTORS INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $3,875 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsAVAIL NYC: $1,500 · Human ServicesDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200 · Health
Other$4,009,040Education$102,700Arts & Culture$59,375Recreation & Sports$7,750Human Services$1,500Health$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $80,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $48,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATCH AND CLOCK COLLECTORS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAVAIL NYC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEWPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHistorical Society of Pennsylvania: $1,380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC DEERFIELD INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMPANY OF THE REDWOOD LIBRARY AND ATHENAEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATCH AND CLOCK COLLECTORS INC ↗
  • Who funds AVAIL NYC ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Historical Society of Pennsylvania ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC DEERFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMPANY OF THE REDWOOD LIBRARY AND ATHENAEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds THE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hohmann FoundationNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hohmann Foundation · Kane Wallace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hohmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hohmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Historic Deerfield Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hohmann Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hohmann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hohmann’s filings →

More from the funding graph