Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hoehn Family Charitable Trust Catheryn E Hoehn Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$3.9MHealth$805kHuman Services$790kRecreation & Sports$675kAnimals$410kPublic Benefit$330kEnvironment$311kPhilanthropy$240kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 54 grants below total $2,749,374 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,994,374 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $245,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $873k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $675k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lawrence University$700,000
Lawrence University$500,000
Northwestern University$195,000
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation$100,000
Orange County Rescue Mission$75,000
Lawrence University$75,000
Hoag Hospital Foundation$70,000
The Salvation Army - Orange County$60,000
Steuben County Community Foundation$50,000
San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance$50,000
Eisenhower Health Foundation$45,000
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Foundation$45,000
Martha's Village and Kitchen$40,000
Children's Hospital of Orange County Foundation$35,000
Clear Lake Township Land Conservancy, Inc.$30,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.9M · 46 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
2

Total granted

$7.9M
$15k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    3× · 2022–2024 · $560k · revenue +4%
  • TR
    THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300k · revenue +45%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $250k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army - Hawaiian and Pacific Islands Division
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UW
    UN World Food Program USA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsVolunteer Fire & RescueCommunity Hospital SystemsUnited Way AffiliatesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Homeless Servic…Environmental Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%40%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%39%35–55yr13%26%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/32
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,946

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lawrence University — $3,675,000 · OtherLawrence University+43 more — $2,420,622 · Other+43 moreNorthwestern University — $560,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE — $300,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center — $130,000 · HealthZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $250,000 · AnimalsOrange County Humane Society — $30,000 · AnimalsCLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $146,400 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THE — $70,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $225,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$6,095,622Recreation & Sports$560,000Education$330,000Health$330,000Animals$280,000Environment$276,400Housing & Shelter$225,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorthwestern University — $560,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE — $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $225,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $146,400 over 3y, 12% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC — $120,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSTEUBEN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPI BETA PHI FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Humane Society — $30,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF EVANSTON — $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAMMA PHI BETA FOUNDATION — $5,622 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds STEUBEN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PI BETA PHI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts
  • Who funds Orange County Humane Society

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.1M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph